The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solar system and equivalence principle constraints onf(R)gravity by the chameleon approach
Open accessAbstract
We study constraints on $f(R)$ dark energy models from solar system experiments combined with experiments on the violation of the equivalence principle. When the mass of an equivalent scalar field degree of freedom is heavy in a region with high density, a spherically symmetric body has a thin shell so that an effective coupling of the fifth force is suppressed through a chameleon mechanism. We place experimental bounds on the cosmologically viable models recently proposed in the literature that have an asymptotic form $f(R)=R\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\lambda}{R}_{c}[1\ensuremath{-}({R}_{c}/R{)}^{2n}]$ in the regime $R\ensuremath{\gg}{R}_{c}$. From the solar system constraints on the post-Newtonian parameter $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, we derive the bound $n>0.5$, whereas the constraints from the violations of the weak and strong equivalence principles give the bound $n>0.9$. This allows a possibility to find the deviation from the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$-cold dark matter ($\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$) cosmological model. For the model $f(R)=R\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\lambda}{R}_{c}(R/{R}_{c}{)}^{p}$ with $0<p<1$ the severest constraint is found to be $p<{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}$, which shows that this model is hardly distinguishable from the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
COPELAND, E. J., SAMI, M., & TSUJIKAWA, S. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x · Cited by 6,239
Self-citationIs cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?
Carroll, S. M., Duvvuri, V., Trodden, M., & Turner, M. S. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043528 · Cited by 2,269
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-2 · Cited by 2,224
Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.123512 · Cited by 2,183
Cole, S., Percival, W. J., Peacock, J. A., Norberg, P., Baugh, C. M., Frenk, C. S., Baldry, I., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., et al. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x · Cited by 2,094
Models off(R)cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests
Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.064004 · Cited by 1,736
Cited by
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Bamba, K., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/045 · Cited by 389
Cosmological inflation inF(R,G)gravity
De Laurentis, M., Paolella, M., & Capozziello, S. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.083531 · Cited by 274
Self-citationConstraints onf(R)theory and Galileons from the latest data of galaxy redshift surveys
Okada, H., Totani, T., & Tsujikawa, S. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103002 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Capozziello, S., & Tsujikawa, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-05-08
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2024192612
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solar system and equivalence principle constraints onf(R)gravity by the chameleon approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.77.107501
- The paper
- Capozziello, S., & Tsujikawa, S. (2008). Solar system and equivalence principle constraints onf(R)gravity by the chameleon approach. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.77.107501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.