Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solar system and equivalence principle constraints onf(R)gravity by the chameleon approach

Open access
Capozziello, Salvatore, Tsujikawa, Shinji·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study constraints on $f(R)$ dark energy models from solar system experiments combined with experiments on the violation of the equivalence principle. When the mass of an equivalent scalar field degree of freedom is heavy in a region with high density, a spherically symmetric body has a thin shell so that an effective coupling of the fifth force is suppressed through a chameleon mechanism. We place experimental bounds on the cosmologically viable models recently proposed in the literature that have an asymptotic form $f(R)=R\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\lambda}{R}_{c}[1\ensuremath{-}({R}_{c}/R{)}^{2n}]$ in the regime $R\ensuremath{\gg}{R}_{c}$. From the solar system constraints on the post-Newtonian parameter $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, we derive the bound $n>0.5$, whereas the constraints from the violations of the weak and strong equivalence principles give the bound $n>0.9$. This allows a possibility to find the deviation from the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$-cold dark matter ($\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$) cosmological model. For the model $f(R)=R\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\lambda}{R}_{c}(R/{R}_{c}{)}^{p}$ with $0<p<1$ the severest constraint is found to be $p<{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}$, which shows that this model is hardly distinguishable from the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.77.107501

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Capozziello, S., & Tsujikawa, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-05-08
Volume
77
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2024192612
Cited by
295
References
36
FWCI
16.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.