The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Next to leading order spin(1)spin(1) effects in the motion of inspiralling compact binaries
Open accessAbstract
Using effective field theory techniques we compute the next to leading order Spin(1)Spin(1) terms in the potential of spinning compact objects at third post-Newtonian (PN) order, including subleading self-induced finite size effects. This result represents the last ingredient to complete the relevant spin potentials to 3PN order from which the equations of motion follow via a canonical formalism. As an example we include the precession equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics
Porto, R. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003 · Cited by 443
Self-citationArun, K. G., Buonanno, A., Faye, G., & Ochsner, E. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.104023 · Cited by 347
Probing ultralight bosons with binary black holes
Baumann, D., Chia, H. S., & Porto, R. A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044001 · Cited by 294
Self-citationPrototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms
Taracchini, A., Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Barausse, E., Boyle, M., Chu, T., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., & Scheel, M. A. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.024011 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Porto, R. A., & Rothstein, I. Z.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-08-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W4247306364
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.