Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms

Open access
Taracchini, Andrea, Pan, Yi, Buonanno, Alessandra, Barausse, Enrico, Boyle, Michael, Chu, Tony, Lovelace, Geoffrey, Pfeiffer, Harald P., Scheel, Mark A.·2012·Physical Review D

Abstract

This paper presents a tunable effective-one-body (EOB) model for black-hole (BH) binaries of arbitrary mass ratio and aligned spins. This new EOB model incorporates recent results of small-mass-ratio simulations based on Teukolsky's perturbative formalism. The free parameters of the model are calibrated to numerical-relativity simulations of nonspinning BH-BH systems of five different mass ratios and to equal-mass nonprecessing BH-BH systems with dimensionless BH spins ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\simeq}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.44$. The present analysis focuses on the orbital dynamics of the resulting EOB model, and on the dominant $(\ensuremath{\ell},m)=(2,2)$ gravitational-wave mode. The calibrated EOB model can generate inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for nonprecessing, spinning BH binaries with any mass ratio and with individual BH spins $\ensuremath{-}1\ensuremath{\le}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.7$. Extremizing only over time and phase shifts, the calibrated EOB model has overlaps larger than 0.997 with each of the seven numerical-relativity waveforms for total masses between $20{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ and $200{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$, using the Advanced LIGO noise curve. We compare the calibrated EOB model with two additional equal-mass highly spinning (${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\simeq}\ensuremath{-}0.95,+0.97$) numerical-relativity waveforms, which were not used during calibration. We find that the calibrated model has an overlap larger than 0.995 with the simulation with nearly extremal antialigned spins. Extension of this model to black holes with aligned spins ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.7$ requires improvements of our modeling of the plunge dynamics and inclusion of higher-order PN spin terms in the gravitational-wave modes and radiation-reaction force.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.86.024011

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Taracchini, A., Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Barausse, E., Boyle, M., Chu, T., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., & Scheel, M. A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2012-07-05
Volume
86
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2129637746
Cited by
255
References
60
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.86.024011
The paper
Taracchini, A., Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Barausse, E., Boyle, M., Chu, T., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., & Scheel, M. A. (2012). Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.024011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.