The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a tunable effective-one-body (EOB) model for black-hole (BH) binaries of arbitrary mass ratio and aligned spins. This new EOB model incorporates recent results of small-mass-ratio simulations based on Teukolsky's perturbative formalism. The free parameters of the model are calibrated to numerical-relativity simulations of nonspinning BH-BH systems of five different mass ratios and to equal-mass nonprecessing BH-BH systems with dimensionless BH spins ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\simeq}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.44$. The present analysis focuses on the orbital dynamics of the resulting EOB model, and on the dominant $(\ensuremath{\ell},m)=(2,2)$ gravitational-wave mode. The calibrated EOB model can generate inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for nonprecessing, spinning BH binaries with any mass ratio and with individual BH spins $\ensuremath{-}1\ensuremath{\le}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.7$. Extremizing only over time and phase shifts, the calibrated EOB model has overlaps larger than 0.997 with each of the seven numerical-relativity waveforms for total masses between $20{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ and $200{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$, using the Advanced LIGO noise curve. We compare the calibrated EOB model with two additional equal-mass highly spinning (${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\simeq}\ensuremath{-}0.95,+0.97$) numerical-relativity waveforms, which were not used during calibration. We find that the calibrated model has an overlap larger than 0.995 with the simulation with nearly extremal antialigned spins. Extension of this model to black holes with aligned spins ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{i}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.7$ requires improvements of our modeling of the plunge dynamics and inclusion of higher-order PN spin terms in the gravitational-wave modes and radiation-reaction force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bardeen, J. M., Press, W. H., & Teukolsky, S. A. (1972) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/151796 · Cited by 2,618
Evolution of Binary Black-Hole Spacetimes
Pretorius, F. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.121101 · Cited by 1,504
Accurate Evolutions of Orbiting Black-Hole Binaries without Excision
Campanelli, M., Lousto, C. O., Marronetti, P., & Zlochower, Y. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.111101 · Cited by 1,423
Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics
Buonanno, A., & Damour, T. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.084006 · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationGravitational-Wave Extraction from an Inspiraling Configuration of Merging Black Holes
Baker, J. G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., & van Meter, J. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.111102 · Cited by 1,283
LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Adhikari, R., Ajith, P., Allen, B., Allen, G., Amin, R. S., Anderson, S. B., Anderson, W. G., Arain, M. A., et al. (2009) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/7/076901 · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationGravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Will, C. M. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.064030 · Cited by 877
Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences
Buonanno, A., & Damour, T. (2000) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.064015 · Cited by 847
Self-citationEffective field theory of gravity for extended objects
Goldberger, W. D., & Rothstein, I. Z. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.104029 · Cited by 738
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Cited by
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Self-citationCatalog of 174 Binary Black Hole Simulations for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Mroué, A. H., Scheel, M. A., Szilágyi, B., Pfeiffer, H. P., Boyle, M., Hemberger, D. A., Kidder, L. E., Lovelace, G., Ossokine, S., Taylor, N. W., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.241104 · Cited by 421
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taracchini, A., Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Barausse, E., Boyle, M., Chu, T., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., & Scheel, M. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-07-05
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2129637746
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.86.024011
- The paper
- Taracchini, A., Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Barausse, E., Boyle, M., Chu, T., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., & Scheel, M. A. (2012). Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.024011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.