Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primordial non-Gaussianity, statistics of collapsed objects, and the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect

Open access
Afshordi, Niayesh, Tolley, Andrew J.·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

Any hint of non-Gaussianity in the cosmological initial conditions will provide us with a unique window into the physics of the early Universe. We show that the impact of a small local primordial non-Gaussianity (generated on superhorizon scales) on the statistics of collapsed objects (such as galaxies or clusters) can be approximated by using slightly modified, but Gaussian, initial conditions, which we describe through simple analytic expressions. Given that numerical simulations with Gaussian initial conditions are relatively well studied, this equivalence provides us with a simple tool to predict signatures of primordial non-Gaussianity in the statistics of collapsed objects. In particular, we describe the predictions for non-Gaussian mass function, and also confirm the recent discovery of a nonlocal bias on large scales [N. Dalal, O. Dore, D. Huterer, and A. Shirokov, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123514 (2008).][S. Matarrese and L. Verde, Astrophys. J. 677, L77 (2008).], as a signature of primordial non-Gaussianity. We then study the potential of galaxy surveys to constrain non-Gaussianity using their autocorrelation and cross correlation with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (due to the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect), as a function of survey characteristics, and predict that they will eventually yield an accuracy of $\ensuremath{\Delta}{f}_{NL}\ensuremath{\sim}0.1$ and 3, respectively, which will be better than or competitive with (but independent of) the best predicted constraints from the CMB. Interestingly, the cross correlation of the CMB and the NRAO VLA Sky Survey galaxy survey already shows a hint of a large local primordial non-Gaussianity: ${f}_{NL}=236\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}127$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.78.123507

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Afshordi, N., & Tolley, A. J.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-12-03
Volume
78
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2092682073
Cited by
199
References
3
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.