The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preheating in the standard model with the Higgs inflaton coupled to gravity
Open accessAbstract
We study the details of preheating in an inflationary scenario in which the standard model Higgs, strongly nonminimally coupled to gravity, plays the role of the inflaton. We find that the Universe does not reheat immediately through perturbative decays, but rather initiates a complex process in which perturbative and nonperturbative effects are mixed. The Higgs condensate starts oscillating around the minimum of its potential, producing $W$ and $Z$ gauge bosons nonperturbatively, due to violation of the so-called adiabaticity condition. However, during each semioscillation, the created gauge bosons partially decay (perturbatively) into fermions. The decay of the gauge bosons prevents the development of parametric resonance, since bosons cannot accumulate significantly at the beginning. However, the energy transferred to the decay products of the bosons is not enough to reheat the Universe, so after about a hundred oscillations, the resonance effects will eventually dominate over the perturbative decays. Around the same time (or slightly earlier), backreaction from the gauge bosons into the Higgs condensate will also start to be significant. Soon afterwards, the Universe is filled with the remnant condensate of the Higgs and a nonthermal distribution of fermions and bosons (those of the standard model), which redshift as radiation and matter, respectively. We compute the distribution of the energy budget among all the species present at the time of backreaction. From there until thermalization, the evolution of the system is highly nonlinear and nonperturbative, and will require a careful study via numerical simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
Linde, A. D. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 · Cited by 6,405
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking
Albrecht, A., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 · Cited by 4,981
Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation
Lyth, D. H., & Riotto, A. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(98)00128-8 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Planck 2018 results: X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration, Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 · Cited by 2,442
Metadata
- Authors
- García-Bellido, J., Figueroa, D. G., & Rubio, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2047517451
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.