Cited by 1,941Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

String axiverse

Open access
Arvanitaki, Asimina, Dimopoulos, Savas, Dubovsky, Sergei, Kaloper, Nemanja, March-Russell, John·2010·Physical Review D

Abstract

String theory suggests the simultaneous presence of many ultralight axions, possibly populating each decade of mass down to the Hubble scale ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}33}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. Conversely the presence of such a plenitude of axions (an axiverse) would be evidence for string theory, since it arises due to the topological complexity of the extra-dimensional manifold and is ad hoc in a theory with just the four familiar dimensions. We investigate how several upcoming astrophysical experiments will be observationally exploring the possible existence of such axions over a vast mass range from ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}33}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. Axions with masses between ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}33}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ can cause a rotation of the cosmic microwave background polarization that is constant throughout the sky. The predicted rotation angle is independent of the scale of inflation and the axion decay constant, and is of order $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\sim}1/137$ --within reach of the just launched Planck satellite. Axions in the mass range ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ give rise to multiple steps in the matter power spectrum, providing us with a snapshot of the axiverse that will be probed by galaxy surveys--such as BOSS, and 21 cm line tomography. Axions in the mass range ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ can affect the dynamics and gravitational wave emission of rapidly rotating astrophysical black holes through the Penrose superradiance process. When the axion Compton wavelength is of order of the black hole size, the axions develop superradiant atomic bound states around the black hole nucleus. Their occupation number grows exponentially by extracting rotational energy and angular momentum from the ergosphere, culminating in a rotating Bose-Einstein axion condensate emitting gravitational waves. For black holes lighter than $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{7}$ solar masses accretion cannot replenish the spin of the black hole, creating mass gaps in the spectrum of rapidly rotating black holes that diagnose the presence of destabilizing axions. In particular, the highly rotating black hole in the X-ray binary LMC X-1 implies an upper limit on the decay constant of the QCD axion ${f}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{17}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, much below the Planck mass. This reach can be improved down to the grand unification scale ${f}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{16}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, by observing smaller stellar mass black holes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.81.123530

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assuming an initial misalignment angle θ_i ≈ 1, the axion contribution to today's energy density is Ω_a h^2 ≈ 0.1 (f/10^17 GeV)^2 (m/10^-22 eV)^{1/2}.

    “Assuming an initial misalignment angle of order one θ i = φ i /f ≈ 1, the axion contribution to today's energy density (normalized by the critical energy density) is given by Arvanitaki et al. (2010) and Kim and Marsh (2016) (see also Hui et al., 2017) a h 2 ≈ 0.1 f 10 17 GeV 2 m 10 -22 eV 1 2 (75”

    From Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology (2018) · cites this paper as Arvanitaki et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arvanitaki, A., Dimopoulos, S., Dubovsky, S., Kaloper, N., & March-Russell, J.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Institute for Nuclear Research (RU)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2010-06-28
Volume
81
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W3037896898
Cited by
1,941
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 251 · 2024: 209 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 38
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
axions, axiverse, string theory, matter power spectrum, rotating black holes, gravitational waves, Bose-Einstein condensate, axion decay, dark matter, extra dimensions, Planck satellite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review