CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 464Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The $H_0$ Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models

Open access
Schöneberg, Nils, Abellán, Guillermo Franco, Sánchez, Andrea Pérez, Witte, Samuel J., Poulin, Vivian, Lesgourgues, Julien·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.10291arXiv 2107.10291
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite the remarkable success of the $Λ$Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) cosmological model, a growing discrepancy has emerged (currently measured at the level of $\sim 4-6 σ$) between the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ measured using the local distance ladder and the value inferred using the cosmic microwave background and galaxy surveys. While a vast array of $Λ$CDM extensions have been proposed to explain these discordant observations, understanding the (relative) success of these models in resolving the tension has proven difficult -- this is a direct consequence of the fact that each model has been subjected to differing, and typically incomplete, compilations of cosmological data. In this review, we attempt to make a systematic comparison of sixteen different models which have been proposed to resolve the $H_0$ tension (spanning both early- and late-Universe solutions), and quantify the relative success of each using a series of metrics and a vast array of data combinations. Owing to the timely appearance of this article, we refer to this contest as the ''$H_0$ Olympics''; the goal being to identify which of the proposed solutions, and more broadly which underlying mechanisms, are most likely to be responsible for explaining the observed discrepancy (should unaccounted for systematics not be the culprit). This work also establishes a foundation of tests which will allow the success of novel proposals to be meaningful ''benchmarked''.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.10291

Cites

235 of 235 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In classifying successful models in solving the MB tension, the best solution appears to be a closed Universe with a varying electron mass.

    “this was carried out in Table 1 of Ref. [74], where the best solution appears to be a closed Universe with a varying electron mass [75].”

    From Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model (2022) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Condensed Summary (p. 11) ranks varying electron mass with curvature first under the Gaussian-tension criterion, but second behind EDE under both the Q_DMAP and ΔAIC criteria. The Discussion (p. 48) likewise places it among several most successful models, rather than identifying it as the single best solution overall. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 237 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [12][12] J. L. Bernal, T. L. Smith, K. K. Boddy, and M. Kamionkowski, 'Robustness of baryon acoustic oscillation constraints for early-Universe modifications of Λ CDM cosmology,' Physical Review D , vol. 102, p. 123515, Dec. 2020. -
  2. [44][44] G. Efstathiou, 'To H0 or not to H0?,' arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2103.08723, Mar. 2021. - · arXiv
  3. [60][60] H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability . Oxford, England: Oxford, third ed., 1961. -
  4. [61][61] S. Nesseris and J. Garcia-Bellido JCAP , vol. 1308, p. 036, 2013. -
  5. [73][73] S. Bashinsky and U. Seljak, 'Neutrino perturbations in CMB anisotropy and matter clustering,' Phys. Rev. D , vol. 69, p. 083002, 2004. -
  6. [74][74] J. Lesgourgues, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and S. Pastor, Neutrino Cosmology . Cambridge University Press, 2 2013. -
  7. [149][149] G. Ballesteros, A. Notari, and F. Rompineve, 'The H 0 tension: ∆ G N vs. ∆ N eff ,' JCAP , vol. 11, p. 024, 2020. -
  8. [181][181] G. F. Abellan, R. Murgia, V. Poulin, and J. Lavalle, 'Hints for decaying dark matter from S 8 measurements,' arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2008.09615, Aug. 2020. - · arXiv
  9. [187][187] D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, M. Archipley, J. S. Avva, K. Aylor, P. S. Barry, R. Basu Thakur, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, K. Byrum, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, H. M. Cho, T. L. Chou, J. F. Cliche, T. M. Crawford, A. Cukierman, C. Daley, T. de Haan, E. V. Denison, K. Dibert, J. Ding, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, A. Foster, J. Fu, S. Galli, A. E. Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, S. Guns, N. Gupta, R. Guyser, N. W. Halverson, A. H. Harke-Hosemann, N. L. Harrington, J. W. Henning, G. C. Hilton, E. Hivon, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, D. Howe, N. Huang, K. D. Irwin, O. B. Jeong, M. Jonas, A. Jones, T. S. Khaire, L. Knox, A. M. Kofman, M. Korman, D. L. Kubik, S. Kuhlmann, C. L. Kuo, A. T. Lee, E. M. Leitch, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, S. S. Meyer, D. Michalik, M. Millea, J. Montgomery, A. Nadolski, T. Natoli, H. Nguyen, G. I. Noble, V. Novosad, Y. Omori, S. Padin, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, J. Pearson, C. M. Posada, K. Prabhu, W. Quan, S. Raghunathan, A. Rahlin, C. L. Reichardt, D. Riebel, B. Riedel, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, J. T. Sayre, E. Schiappucci, E. Shirokoff, G. Smecher, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, K. T. Story, A. Suzuki, K. L. Thompson, B. Thorne, C. Tucker, C. Umilta, L. R. Vale, K. Vanderlinde, J. D. Vieira, G. Wang, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, V. Yefremenko, K. W. Yoon, and M. R. Young, 'Measurements of the E-Mode Polarization and Temperature-E-Mode Correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 Data,' arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2101.01684, Jan. 2021. - · arXiv
  10. [202][202] S. Vagnozzi, 'Consistency tests of ΛCDM from the early ISW effect: implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension,' arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2105.10425, May 2021. - · arXiv
  11. [206][206] J. L. Bernal, L. Verde, R. Jimenez, M. Kamionkowski, D. Valcin, and B. D. Wandelt, 'The trouble beyond H 0 and the new cosmic triangles,' Phys. Rev. D , vol. 103, no. 10, p. 103533, 2021. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Schöneberg, N., Abellán, G. F., Sánchez, A. P., Witte, S. J., Poulin, V., & Lesgourgues, J.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Delta Institute for Theoretical Physics (NL)
Corresponding author
Schöneberg, Nils
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
984
Pages
1-55
ISSN
0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.10291
arXiv
2107.10291
OpenAlex
W3184920340
Cited by
463
References
237
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 3
FWCI
38.10
Type
journal article
Language
lv
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physics Reports (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Hubble tension, cosmological model comparison, local distance ladder, cosmic microwave background, galaxy surveys, model benchmarking, cosmological systematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review