The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we construct an effective field theory (EFT) that describes long wavelength gravitational radiation from compact systems. To leading order, this EFT consists of the multipole expansion, which we describe in terms of a diffeomorphism invariant point particle Lagrangian. The EFT also systematically captures ``post-Minkowskian'' corrections to the multipole expansion due to nonlinear terms in general relativity. Specifically, we compute long distance corrections from the coupling of the (mass) monopole moment to the quadrupole moment, including up to two mass insertions. Along the way, we encounter both logarithmic short distance (UV) and long wavelength (IR) divergences. We show that the UV divergences can be (1) absorbed into a renormalization of the multipole moments and (2) resummed via the renormalization group. The IR singularities are shown to cancel from properly defined physical observables. As a concrete example of the formalism, we use this EFT to reproduce a number of post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational wave energy flux from nonrelativistic binaries, including long distance effects up to 3 post-Newtonian (${v}^{6}$) order. Our results verify that the factorization of scales proposed in the NRGR framework of Goldberger and Rothstein is consistent up to order 3PN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments
Christodoulou, D. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1486 · Cited by 638
Cited by
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics
Porto, R. A. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003 · Cited by 443
Probing ultralight bosons with binary black holes
Baumann, D., Chia, H. S., & Porto, R. A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044001 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberger, W. D., & Ross, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-06-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2125729703
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.81.124015
- The paper
- Goldberger, W. D., & Ross, A. (2010). Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.81.124015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.