The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reactor antineutrino anomaly
Open accessAbstract
Recently, new reactor antineutrino spectra have been provided for $^{235}\mathrm{U}$, $^{239}\mathrm{Pu}$, $^{241}\mathrm{Pu}$, and $^{238}\mathrm{U}$, increasing the mean flux by about 3%. To a good approximation, this reevaluation applies to all reactor neutrino experiments. The synthesis of published experiments at reactor-detector distances $<100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{m}$ leads to a ratio of observed event rate to predicted rate of $0.976\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.024$. With our new flux evaluation, this ratio shifts to $0.943\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.023$, leading to a deviation from unity at 98.6% C.L. which we call the reactor antineutrino anomaly. The compatibility of our results with the existence of a fourth nonstandard neutrino state driving neutrino oscillations at short distances is discussed. The combined analysis of reactor data, gallium solar neutrino calibration experiments, and MiniBooNE-$\ensuremath{\nu}$ data disfavors the no-oscillation hypothesis at 99.8% C.L. The oscillation parameters are such that $|\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}_{\mathrm{new}}^{2}|>1.5\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}$ (95%) and ${sin}^{2}(2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathrm{new}})=0.14\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08$ (95%). Constraints on the ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}$ neutrino mixing angle are revised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From the Trees to the Forest: A Review of Radiative Neutrino Mass Models
Cai, Y., Herrero García, J., Schmidt, M. A., Vicente, A., & Volkas, R. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00063 · Cited by 341
Neutrino physics from the cosmic microwave background and large scale structure
Abazajian, K. N., Arnold, K., Austermann, J., Benson, B. A., Bischoff, C., Bock, J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Calabrese, E., Carlstrom, J. E., et al. (2015) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.05.014 · Cited by 280
NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE-BETA DECAY: A BRIEF REVIEW
BILENKY, S. M., & GIUNTI, C. (2012) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732312300157 · Cited by 176
Constraining models of f(R) gravity with Planck and WiggleZ power spectrum data
Dossett, J., Hu, B., & Parkinson, D. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/046 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Mention, G., Fechner, M., Lasserre, T., Mueller, T. A., Lhuillier, D., Cribier, M., & Letourneau, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-04-29
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1895226013
- Cited by
- 1,323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactor antineutrino anomaly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.83.073006
- The paper
- Mention, G., Fechner, M., Lasserre, T., Mueller, T. A., Lhuillier, D., Cribier, M., & Letourneau, A. (2011). Reactor antineutrino anomaly. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.83.073006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.