The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence
Open accessAbstract
Coalescences of binary neutron stars and/or black holes are amongst the most likely gravitational-wave signals to be observed in ground-based interferometric detectors. Apart from the astrophysical importance of their detection, they will also provide us with our very first empirical access to the genuine strong-field dynamics of general relativity (GR). We present a new framework based on Bayesian model selection aimed at detecting deviations from GR, subject to the constraints of the Advanced Virgo and LIGO detectors. The method tests the consistency of coefficients appearing in the waveform with the predictions made by GR, without relying on any specific alternative theory of gravity. The framework is suitable for low signal-to-noise ratio events through the construction of multiple subtests, most of which involve only a limited number of coefficients. It also naturally allows for the combination of information from multiple sources to increase one's confidence in GR or a violation thereof. We expect it to be capable of finding a wide range of possible deviations from GR, including ones which, in principle, cannot be accommodated by the model waveforms, on the condition that the induced change in phase at frequencies where the detectors are the most sensitive is comparable to the effect of a few percent change in one or more of the low-order post-Newtonian phase coefficients. In principle, the framework can be used with any GR waveform approximant, with arbitrary parametrized deformations, to serve as model waveforms. In order to illustrate the workings of the method, we perform a range of numerical experiments in which simulated gravitational waves modeled in the restricted post-Newtonian, stationary phase approximation are added to Gaussian and stationary noise that follows the expected Advanced LIGO/Virgo noise curves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Massive and mass-less Yang-Mills and gravitational fields
van Dam, H., & Veltman, M. (1970) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90416-5 · Cited by 1,288
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T. G. F., Del Pozzo, W., Vitale, S., Van Den Broeck, C., Agathos, M., Veitch, J., Grover, K., Sidery, T., Sturani, R., & Vecchio, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-04-26
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2014804681
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.85.082003
- The paper
- Li, T. G. F., Del Pozzo, W., Vitale, S., Van Den Broeck, C., Agathos, M., Veitch, J., Grover, K., Sidery, T., Sturani, R., & Vecchio, A. (2012). Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.85.082003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.