The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory
Open accessAbstract
The degrees of freedom of any interacting quantum field theory are entangled in momentum space. Thus, in the vacuum state, the infrared degrees of freedom are described by a density matrix with an entanglement entropy. We derive a relation between this density matrix and the Wilsonian effective action obtained by integrating out degrees of freedom with spatial momentum above some scale. We argue that the entanglement entropy of and mutual information between subsets of field theoretic degrees of freedom at different momentum scales are natural observables in quantum field theory and demonstrate how to compute these in perturbation theory. The results may be understood heuristically based on the scale dependence of the coupling strength and number of degrees of freedom. We measure the rate at which entanglement between degrees of freedom declines as their scales separate and suggest that this decay is related to the property of decoupling in quantum field theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1999) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 · Cited by 6,704
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302
The density-matrix renormalization group
Schollwöck, U. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.259 · Cited by 3,323
Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0405152 · Cited by 3,275
Entanglement renormalization and holography
Swingle, B. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 · Cited by 915
Area Laws in Quantum Systems: Mutual Information and Correlations
Wolf, M. M., Verstraete, F., Hastings, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.070502 · Cited by 696
Cited by
Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems
Laflorencie, N. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.008 · Cited by 765
Holographic mutual information is monogamous
Hayden, P., Headrick, M., & Maloney, A. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.046003 · Cited by 326
Holographic dynamics from multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz
Chua, V., Passias, V., Tiwari, A., & Ryu, S. (2017) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.195152 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Balasubramanian, V., McDermott, M. B., & Van Raamsdonk, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-08-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2048563620
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.