The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Threshold of primordial black hole formation
Open accessAbstract
Based on a physical argument, we derive a new analytic formula for the amplitude of density perturbation at the threshold of primordial black hole formation in the Universe dominated by a perfect fluid with the equation of state $p=w\ensuremath{\rho}{c}^{2}$ for $w\ensuremath{\ge}0$. The formula gives ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{Hc}^{\mathrm{UH}}={sin}^{2}[\ensuremath{\pi}\sqrt{w}/(1+3w)]$ and ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\delta}}}_{c}=[3(1+w)/(5+3w)]{sin}^{2}[\ensuremath{\pi}\sqrt{w}/(1+3w)]$, where ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{Hc}^{\mathrm{UH}}$ and ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\delta}}}_{c}$ are the amplitude of the density perturbation at the horizon crossing time in the uniform Hubble slice and the amplitude measure used in numerical simulations, respectively, while the conventional one gives ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{Hc}^{\mathrm{UH}}=w$ and ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\delta}}}_{c}=3w(1+w)/\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}(5+3w)$. Our formula shows a much better agreement with the result of recent numerical simulations both qualitatively and quantitatively than the conventional formula. For a radiation fluid, our formula gives ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{Hc}^{\mathrm{UH}}={sin}^{2}(\sqrt{3}\ensuremath{\pi}/6)\ensuremath{\simeq}0.6203$ and ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\delta}}}_{c}=(2/3){sin}^{2}(\sqrt{3}\ensuremath{\pi}/6)\ensuremath{\simeq}0.4135$. We also discuss the maximum amplitude and the cosmological implications of the present result.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Each cycle produces O(106) primordial black holes with M∼102M⊙ [51,52,53,54,55,56].”
From Counting Cosmic Cycles: Past Big Crunches, Future Recurrence Limits, and the Age of the Quantum Memory Matrix Universe (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524646 · Cited by 10,624
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188
Black Holes in the Early Universe
Carr, B. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1974) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399 · Cited by 1,827
New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes
Carr, B. J., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.104019 · Cited by 1,166
Self-citationNear-Critical Gravitational Collapse and the Initial Mass Function of Primordial Black Holes
Niemeyer, J. C., & Jedamzik, K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5481 · Cited by 393
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Y. B. Zel’dovich, 1967, Sov. Astron., 10, 602
- S. Hawking, 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 152, 75, 10.1093/mnras/152.1.75 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/153853 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.124025 · DOI
- D. K. Nadezhin, 1978, Sov. Astron., 22, 129
- I. D. Novikov, 1980, Sov. Astron., 24, 147
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.124013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.084002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0264-9381/22/7/013 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/24/6/003 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/26/23/235001 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90624-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063507 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/04/001 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/017 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/033 · DOI
- 10.1080/00018738200101428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00018737000101171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.1938 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.104009 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/027 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Massive primordial black holes from hybrid inflation as dark matter and the seeds of galaxies
Clesse, S., & García-Bellido, J. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.023524 · Cited by 471
Neukart, F., Marx, E., & Vinokur, V. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27101043 · Cited by 4
“Each cycle produces O ( 10 6 ) primordial black holes with M ∼ 10 2 M ⊙ [51–56].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Harada, T., Yoo, C.-M., & Kohri, K.
- Affiliations
- Rikkyo University (JP)
- Nagoya University (JP)
- High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JP)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-10-28
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 84051
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2159350339
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23654082, 22244030, 21111006, 23540327)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- primordial black holes, black hole formation threshold, horizon crossing, equation of state parameter, radiation-dominated universe, analytic formula, cosmological implications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review