The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmological constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter
Open accessAbstract
Despite the great successes of the cold dark matter (CDM) model in explaining a wide range of observations of the global evolution and the formation of galaxies and large-scale structure in the Universe, the origin and microscopic nature of dark matter is still unknown. The most common form of CDM considered to date is that of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), but, so far, attempts to detect WIMPs directly or indirectly have not yet succeeded, and the allowed range of particle parameters has been significantly restricted. Some of the cosmological predictions for this kind of CDM are even in apparent conflict with observations (e.g., cuspy-cored halos and an overabundance of satellite dwarf galaxies). For these reasons, it is important to consider the consequences of different forms of CDM. We focus here on the hypothesis that the dark matter is comprised, instead, of ultralight bosons that form a Bose--Einstein condensate, described by a complex scalar field, for which particle number per unit comoving volume is conserved. We start from the Klein--Gordon and Einstein field equations to describe the evolution of the Friedmann--Robertson--Walker universe in the presence of this kind of dark matter. We find that, in addition to the radiation-, matter-, and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$-dominated phases familiar from the standard CDM model, there is an earlier phase of scalar-field domination, which is special to this model. In addition, while WIMP CDM is nonrelativistic at all times after it decouples, the equation of state of Bose--Einstein condensed scalar field dark matter (SFDM) is found to be relativistic at early times, evolving from stiff ($\overline{p}=\overline{\ensuremath{\rho}}$) to radiationlike ($\overline{p}=\overline{\ensuremath{\rho}}/3$), before it becomes nonrelativistic and CDM-like at late times ($\overline{p}=0$). The timing of the transitions between these phases and regimes is shown to yield fundamental constraints on the SFDM model parameters, particle mass $m$, and self-interaction coupling strength $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. We show that SFDM is compatible with observations of the evolving background universe, by deriving the range of particle parameters required to match observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the abundances of the light elements produced by big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), including ${N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$, the effective number of neutrino species, and the epoch of matter-radiation equality ${z}_{\mathrm{eq}}$. This yields $m\ensuremath{\ge}2.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}21}\text{ }\mathrm{eV}/{c}^{2}$ and $9.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\lambda}/({\mathrm{mc}}^{2}{)}^{2}\ensuremath{\le}4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}$. Indeed, our model can accommodate current observations in which ${N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is higher at the BBN epoch than at ${z}_{\mathrm{eq}}$, probed by the CMB, which is otherwise unexplained by the standard CDM model involving WIMPs. We also show that SFDM without self-interaction (also called ``fuzzy dark matter'') is not able to comply with the current constraints from BBN within 68% confidence and is therefore disfavored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
Quintessence and the Rest of the World: Suppressing Long-Range Interactions
Carroll, S. M. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3067 · Cited by 1,172
A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe
Zeldovich, Y. B. (1972) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/160.1.1p · Cited by 708
Cited by
Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks
Arvanitaki, A., Huang, J., & Van Tilburg, K. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.015015 · Cited by 404
Galaxy formation with BECDM – I. Turbulence and relaxation of idealized haloes
Mocz, P., Vogelsberger, M., Robles, V. H., Zavala, J., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Fialkov, A., & Hernquist, L. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1887 · Cited by 323
Probing ultralight bosons with binary black holes
Baumann, D., Chia, H. S., & Porto, R. A. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044001 · Cited by 294
Do dark matter axions form a condensate with long-range correlation?
Guth, A. H., Hertzberg, M. P., & Prescod-Weinstein, C. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.103513 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., Rindler-Daller, T., & Shapiro, P. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2008045161
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.89.083536
- The paper
- Li, B., Rindler-Daller, T., & Shapiro, P. R. (2014). Cosmological constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.89.083536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.