Cited by 459Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Adiabatic regularization of the energy-momentum tensor of a quantized field in homogeneous spaces

Parker, Leonard, Fulling, S. A.·1974·Physical Review D

Abstract

In the theory of a quantized scalar field interacting with the classical Einstein gravitational field, the formal expression for the energy-momentum tensor has infinite expectation values. We propose a procedure for defining, in certain cosmological models, suitable finite expectation values of this tensor, when the mass of the scalar matter field does not vanish. Our method uses the decomposition of the scalar field into modes permitted by the symmetry of the models. The identification of the divergent terms, which are to be subtracted mode by mode from the formal tensor, follows in a natural manner from the identification of physically relevant creation and annihilation operators under conditions of arbitrarily slow (adiabatic) time dependence of the metric. The extension of the results to periods of strong time dependence is accomplished with the aid of the requirement that the four-divergence of the regularized energy-momentum tensor remain zero at all times. The energy-momentum tensor obtained by adiabatic regularization is the same as that obtained by the $n$-wave regularization procedure of Zel'dovich and Starobinsky, although the two methods are conceptually quite different. In this paper we apply the adiabatic-regularization method to the minimally coupled scalar field with positive mass in the Robertson-Walker universes. Later papers will concern extensions to conformal coupling, anisotropic metrics, and massless fields, as well as a possible physical interpretation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.9.341

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling has only been shown equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled and the spacetime M^{1,d-1}×S^1 is conformally flat (scale factors equal).

    “The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling [29,30], though well suited to cosmology, has only been shown to be equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled, and the spacetime Mfoot_0, d-1 × S 1 is conformally flat i.e. when the scale factors of the two product spaces are equal [31].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, L., & Fulling, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1974-01-15
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
341-354
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981729129
Cited by
459
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
adiabatic regularization, energy-momentum tensor, quantum scalar field, Einstein field equations, modal decomposition, Robertson-Walker universe, cosmological models, minimally coupled scalar field, homogeneous spaces, coupling constant renormalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review