The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural inflation with multiple sub-Planckian axions
Open accessAbstract
We extend the Kim-Nilles-Peloso (KNP) alignment mechanism for natural inflation to models with $N>2$ axions, which obtains super-Planckian effective axion decay constant ${f}_{\text{eff}}\ensuremath{\gg}{M}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ through an alignment of the anomaly coefficients of multiple axions having sub-Planckian fundamental decay constants ${f}_{0}\ensuremath{\ll}{M}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$. The original version of the KNP mechanism realized with two axions requires that some of the anomaly coefficients should be of the order of ${f}_{\text{eff}}/{f}_{0}$, which would be uncomfortably large if ${f}_{\text{eff}}/{f}_{0}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}\mathcal{O}(100)$ as suggested by the recent BICEP2 results. We note that the KNP mechanism can be realized with the anomaly coefficients of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ if the number of axions $N$ is large as $N\mathrm{ln}N\ensuremath{\gtrsim}2\mathrm{ln}({f}_{\text{eff}}/{f}_{0})$, in which case the effective decay constant can be enhanced as ${f}_{\text{eff}}/{f}_{0}\ensuremath{\sim}\sqrt{N!}{n}^{N\ensuremath{-}1}$ for $n$ denoting the typical size of the integer-valued anomaly coefficients. Comparing to the other multiple axion scenario, the $N$-flation scenario which requires $N\ensuremath{\sim}{f}_{\text{eff}}^{2}/{f}_{0}^{2}$, the KNP mechanism has a virtue of not invoking to a too large number of axions, although it requires a specific alignment of the anomaly coefficients, which can be achieved with a probability of $\mathcal{O}({f}_{0}/{f}_{\text{eff}})$ under a random choice of the anomaly coefficients. We also present a simple model realizing a multiple axion monodromy along the inflaton direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The landscape of QCD axion models
Di Luzio, L., Giannotti, M., Nardi, E., & Visinelli, L. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 · Cited by 657
Fencing in the Swampland: quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)023 · Cited by 232
Montero, M., Uranga, A. M., & Valenzuela, I. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)032 · Cited by 200
McAllister, L., Silverstein, E., Westphal, A., & Wrase, T. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2014)123 · Cited by 194
Natural inflation and quantum gravity
de la Fuente, A., Saraswat, P., & Sundrum, R. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.151303 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, K., Kim, H., & Yun, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-07-30
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2088770862
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural inflation with multiple sub-Planckian axions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.90.023545
- The paper
- Choi, K., Kim, H., & Yun, S. (2014). Natural inflation with multiple sub-Planckian axions. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.90.023545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.