Causal structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Open accessAbstract
We analyze causal structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity. It is known that Gauss-Bonnet gravity potentially has superluminal propagation of gravitons due to its noncanonical kinetic terms. In a theory with superluminal modes, an analysis of causality based on null curves makes no sense, and thus, we need to analyze them in a different way. In this paper, using the method of the characteristics, we analyze the causal structure in Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We have the result that, on a Killing horizon, gravitons can propagate in the null direction tangent to the Killing horizon. Therefore, a Killing horizon can be a causal edge as in the case of general relativity; i.e. a Killing horizon is the ``event horizon'' in the sense of causality. We also analyze causal structures on nonstationary solutions with $(D\ensuremath{-}2)$-dimensional maximal symmetry, including spherically symmetric and flat spaces. If the geometrical null energy condition, ${R}_{AB}{N}^{A}{N}^{B}\ensuremath{\ge}0$ for any null vector ${N}^{A}$, is satisfied, the radial velocity of gravitons must be less than or equal to that of light. However, if the geometrical null energy condition is violated, gravitons can propagate faster than light. Hence, on an evaporating black hole where the geometrical null energy condition is expected not to hold, classical gravitons can escape from the ``black hole'' defined with null curves. That is, the causal structures become nontrivial. It may be one of the possible solutions for the information loss paradox of evaporating black holes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Izumi proved that a Killing horizon is a characteristic hypersurface for all gravitational degrees of freedom in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory.
“He proved that a Killing horizon is a characteristic hypersurface for all gravitational degrees of freedom.”
From Causality and hyperbolicity of Lovelock theories (2014) · cites this paper as [9]
A Killing horizon is a characteristic hypersurface for all gravitational degrees of freedom, generalising a result of [9].
“We proved that a Killing horizon is a characteristic hypersurface for all gravitational degrees of freedom, generalising a result of [9].”
From Causality and hyperbolicity of Lovelock theories (2014) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
String-Generated Gravity Models
Boulware, D. G., & Deser, S. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2656 · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from gravitational Cherenkov radiation
Moore, G. D., & Nelson, A. E. (2001) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/023 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [51]S. Mukohyama and J. -P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 87 , no. 6, 065020 (2013).
- [52]S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 87 , no. 8, 085030 (2013).
- [54]R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics , Vol.2, Wiley-Interscience, Inc., New York (1962) pp. 590 and 596.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Causality and hyperbolicity of Lovelock theories
Reall, H. S., Tanahashi, N., & Way, B. (2014) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205005 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
- Authors
- Izumi, K.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Izumi, Keisuke
- ORCID
- Izumi, Keisuke
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-08-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2039352629
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, causal structure, Killing horizons, null curves, method of characteristics, evaporating black holes, black hole information paradox, spherically symmetric spacetimes, flat spacetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review