The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jet flavor classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Classification of jets as originating from light-flavor or heavy-flavor quarks is an important task for inferring the nature of particles produced in high-energy collisions. The large and variable dimensionality of the data provided by the tracking detectors makes this task difficult. The current state-of-the-art tools require expert data reduction to convert the data into a fixed low-dimensional form that can be effectively managed by shallow classifiers. We study the application of deep networks to this task, attempting classification at several levels of data, starting from a raw list of tracks. We find that the highest-level lowest-dimensionality expert information sacrifices information needed for classification, that the performance of current state-of-the-art taggers can be matched or slightly exceeded by deep-network-based taggers using only track and vertex information, that classification using only lowest-level highest-dimensionality tracking information remains a difficult task for deep networks, and that adding lower-level track and vertex information to the classifiers provides a significant boost in performance compared to the state of the art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
The dropout learning algorithm
Baldi, P., & Sadowski, P. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2014.02.004 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Cited by
Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV
Sirunyan, A. M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Ambrogi, F., Asilar, E., Bergauer, T., Brandstetter, J., Brondolin, E., Dragicevic, M., Erö, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Instrumentation · doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 · Cited by 632
Jet tagging via particle clouds
Qu, H., & Gouskos, L. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.056019 · Cited by 425
Deep learning and its application to LHC physics
Guest, D., Cranmer, K., & Whiteson, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021019 · Cited by 417
Self-citationLarkoski, A. J., Moult, I., & Nachman, B. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 · Cited by 361
Inner and Outer Recursive Neural Networks for Chemoinformatics Applications
Urban, G., Subrahmanya, N., & Baldi, P. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00384 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guest, D., Collado, J., Baldi, P., Hsu, S.-C., Urban, G., & Whiteson, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-12-02
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2491766731
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.