PreprintCited by 6,382Neural Networks and ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors

Open access
Hinton, Geoffrey E., Srivastava, Nitish, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan R.·2012·arXiv

Abstract

When a large feedforward neural network is trained on a small training set, it typically performs poorly on held-out test data. This "overfitting" is greatly reduced by randomly omitting half of the feature detectors on each training case. This prevents complex co-adaptations in which a feature detector is only helpful in the context of several other specific feature detectors. Instead, each neuron learns to detect a feature that is generally helpful for producing the correct answer given the combinatorially large variety of internal contexts in which it must operate. Random "dropout" gives big improvements on many benchmark tasks and sets new records for speech and object recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The weighted normalized geometric mean of per-model outputs approximates the arithmetic mean better than the geometric mean, and the quality of this approximation depends on consistency in neuron activation.

    “It has been shown though [52], that in dropout-like [53] systems activation units of complete models produce a weighted normalized geometric mean of per-model outputs.”

    From ModDrop: Adaptive Multi-Modal Gesture Recognition (2016) · cites this paper as [53]

    The main text (p. 2) says that, for a single-hidden-layer network with a softmax output, the mean network is exactly equivalent to taking the geometric mean of the dropout models’ predicted distributions. It does not say that a weighted normalized geometric mean approximates the arithmetic mean better than the geometric mean, or that approximation quality depends on consistency in neuron activation. The discussion on p. 5 instead says that dropout with probability 0.5 gives the models equal importance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The state-of-the-art for a fully-connected 784-1200-1200-10 network with dropout regularization (50% for hidden units and 20% for the input) and tanh activations is 107 errors on the MNIST test set.

    “Currently, the state-of-the-art for a fully-connected 7821200-1200-10 network with dropout regularization (50% for hidden units and 20% for the input) and tanh activations [53] is 107 errors on the MNIST test set (see Table 7).”

    From ModDrop: Adaptive Multi-Modal Gesture Recognition (2016) · cites this paper as [53]

    Appendix A.1 (p. 8) lists the 784-1200-1200-10 MNIST architecture and specifies 50% dropout for hidden units and 20% for input units. The main text (p. 2) reports about 110 test errors with those dropout rates, but our copy does not establish exactly 107 errors for that architecture or specify tanh activations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To avoid overfitting, YOLO uses dropout and extensive data augmentation.

    “To avoid overfitting we use dropout and extensive data augmentation.”

    From You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection (2016) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper states that dropout reduces overfitting (p. 1) and describes using dropout with data augmentation for its ImageNet model (H Models for ImageNet, p. 18). It does not establish that YOLO uses either technique or describe YOLO’s augmentation as extensive. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A dropout layer with rate .5 after the first connected layer prevents co-adaptation between layers.

    “A dropout layer with rate = .5 after the first connected layer prevents co-adaptation between layers [18].”

    From You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection (2016) · cites this paper as [18]

    The main text (p. 1) says dropout omits hidden units with probability 0.5 to prevent complex co-adaptations. But the discussion of fully connected layers (p. 5) does not establish that placing one dropout layer after the first fully connected layer has that effect; it says dropout in all hidden layers works better than dropout in only one. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dropout randomly sets activations to 0 during training, making the model less sensitive to specific weights.

    “Dropout is a recently introduced regularization technique where randomly selected activations are set to 0 during the training, so that the model becomes less sensitive to specific weights in the network [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [4]4. Y. B. Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, P. Haffner, Proceedings of the IEEE 86 , 2278 (1998).
  2. [6]6. A. Mohamed, G. Dahl, G. Hinton, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20 , 14 (2012).
  3. [7]7. G. Dahl, D. Yu, L. Deng, A. Acero, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20 , 30 (2012).
  4. [10]10. A. Coates, A. Y. Ng, ICML (2011), pp. 921-928.
  5. [14]14. R. M. Neal, Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Statistics No. 118 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
  6. [19]19. D. D. Lewis, T. G. R. Y. Yang, Journal of Machine Learning 5 , 361 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1904365287
Cited by
6,382
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 361 · 2023: 402 · 2022: 392 · 2021: 814 · 2020: 750 · 2019: 795 · 2018: 703 · 2017: 600 · 2016: 511 · 2015: 439 · 2014: 284 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
dropout, co-adaptation, feature detectors, overfitting, feedforward neural networks, limited training data, generalization, speech recognition, object recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review