Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with LIGO and LISA

Open access
Brito, Richard, Ghosh, Shrobana, Barausse, Enrico, Berti, Emanuele, Cardoso, Vitor, Dvorkin, Irina, Klein, Antoine, Pani, Paolo·2017·Physical Review D

Abstract

Ultralight bosons can induce superradiant instabilities in spinning black holes, tapping their rotational energy to trigger the growth of a bosonic condensate. Possible observational imprints of these boson clouds include (i) direct detection of the nearly monochromatic (resolvable or stochastic) gravitational waves emitted by the condensate, and (ii) statistically significant evidence for the formation of ``holes'' at large spins in the spin versus mass plane (sometimes also referred to as ``Regge plane'') of astrophysical black holes. In this work, we focus on the prospects of LISA and LIGO detecting or constraining scalars with mass in the range ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\in}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ and ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\in}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}14},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, respectively. Using astrophysical models of black-hole populations calibrated to observations and black-hole perturbation theory calculations of the gravitational emission, we find that, in optimistic scenarios, LIGO could observe a stochastic background of gravitational radiation in the range ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\in}[2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, and up to $1{0}^{4}$ resolvable events in a 4-year search if ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\sim}3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. LISA could observe a stochastic background for boson masses in the range ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\in}[5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19},5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}]$, and up to $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{3}$ resolvable events in a 4-year search if ${m}_{s}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. LISA could further measure spins for black-hole binaries with component masses in the range $[{10}^{3},{10}^{7}]{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$, which is not probed by traditional spin-measurement techniques. A statistical analysis of the spin distribution of these binaries could either rule out scalar fields in the mass range $\ensuremath{\sim}[4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}18},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}14}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, or measure ${m}_{s}$ with ten percent accuracy if light scalars in the mass range $\ensuremath{\sim}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ exist.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.96.064050

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Brito, R., Ghosh, S., Barausse, E., Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Dvorkin, I., Klein, A., & Pani, P.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
96
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2685642551
Cited by
333
References
5
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.