Cited by 370Particle Detector Development and PerformanceParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research

CaloGAN: Simulating 3D high energy particle showers in multilayer electromagnetic calorimeters with generative adversarial networks

Open access
Paganini, Michela, de Oliveira, Luke, Nachman, Benjamin·2018·Physical Review D

Abstract

The precise modeling of subatomic particle interactions and propagation through matter is paramount for the advancement of nuclear and particle physics searches and precision measurements. The most computationally expensive step in the simulation pipeline of a typical experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the detailed modeling of the full complexity of physics processes that govern the motion and evolution of particle showers inside calorimeters. We introduce CaloGAN, a new fast simulation technique based on generative adversarial networks (GANs). We apply these neural networks to the modeling of electromagnetic showers in a longitudinally segmented calorimeter and achieve speedup factors comparable to or better than existing full simulation techniques on CPU ($100\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}--1000\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}$) and even faster on GPU (up to $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{5}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}$). There are still challenges for achieving precision across the entire phase space, but our solution can reproduce a variety of geometric shower shape properties of photons, positrons, and charged pions. This represents a significant stepping stone toward a full neural network-based detector simulation that could save significant computing time and enable many analyses now and in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.97.014021

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scientific knowledge can also be used to advance other aspects of data science, such as the design of scientific workflows or the generation of model simulations.

    “Scientific knowledge can also be used to advance other aspects of data science, e.g., the design of scientific work-flows [83], [84] or the generation of model simulations [85].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paganini, M., de Oliveira, L., & Nachman, B.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2018-01-30
Volume
97
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2614083378
Cited by
370
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
FWCI
23.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-FG02-92ER40704)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Keywords
electromagnetic calorimeter, generative adversarial networks, longitudinal segmentation, shower shape, Large Hadron Collider, simulation acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review