Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-resonance after inflation: Oscillons, transients, and radiation domination

Open access
Lozanov, Kaloian D., Amin, Mustafa A.·2018·Physical Review D

Abstract

Homogeneous oscillations of the inflaton after inflation can be unstable to small spatial perturbations even without coupling to other fields. We show that for inflaton potentials $\ensuremath{\propto}|\ensuremath{\phi}{|}^{2n}$ near $|\ensuremath{\phi}|=0$ and flatter beyond some $|\ensuremath{\phi}|=M$, the inflaton condensate oscillations can lead to self-resonance, followed by its complete fragmentation. We find that for nonquadratic minima ($n>1$), shortly after backreaction, the equation of state parameter, $w\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1/3$. If $M\ensuremath{\ll}{m}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, radiation domination is established within less than an $e$-fold of expansion after the end of inflation. In this case self-resonance is efficient and the condensate fragments into transient, localised spherical objects which are unstable and decay, leaving behind them a virialized field with mean kinetic and gradient energies much greater than the potential energy. This end-state yields $w=1/3$. When $M\ensuremath{\sim}{m}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ we observe slow and steady, self-resonance that can last many $e$-folds before backreaction eventually shuts it off, followed by fragmentation and $w\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1/3$. We provide analytical estimates for the duration to $w\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1/3$ after inflation, which can be used as an upper bound (under certain assumptions) on the duration of the transition between the inflationary and the radiation dominated states of expansion. This upper bound can reduce uncertainties in CMB observables such as the spectral tilt ${n}_{\mathrm{s}}$, and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. For quadratic minima ($n=1$), $w\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ regardless of the value of $M$. This is because when $M\ensuremath{\ll}{m}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, long-lived oscillons form within an $e$-fold after inflation, and collectively behave as pressureless dust thereafter. For $M\ensuremath{\sim}{m}_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, the self-resonance is inefficient and the condensate remains intact (ignoring long-term gravitational clustering) and keeps oscillating about the quadratic minimum, again implying $w=0$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.97.023533

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Lozanov, K. D., & Amin, M. A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2018-01-29
Volume
97
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2765357588
Cited by
227
References
5
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.