Scalar-tensor theories and modified gravity in the wake of GW170817
Open accessAbstract
Theories of dark energy and modified gravity can be strongly constrained by astrophysical or cosmological observations, as illustrated by the recent observation of the gravitational wave event GW170817 and of its electromagnetic counterpart GRB 170817A, which showed that the speed of gravitational waves, ${c}_{g}$, is the same as the speed of light, within deviations of order ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}$. This observation implies severe restrictions on scalar-tensor theories, in particular theories whose action depends on second derivatives of a scalar field. Working in the very general framework of degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor (DHOST) theories, which encompass Horndeski and beyond Horndeski theories, we present the DHOST theories that satisfy ${c}_{g}=c$. We then examine, for these theories, the screening mechanism that suppresses scalar interactions on small scales, namely the Vainshtein mechanism, and compute the corresponding gravitational laws for a nonrelativistic spherical body. We show that it can lead to a deviation from standard gravity inside matter, parametrized by three coefficients which satisfy a consistency relation and can be constrained by present and future astrophysical observations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Langlois et al. (2018) showed mimetic gravity theories can be formulated as DHOST with extra local gauge symmetry; they study linear perturbations and find they have either gradient instabilities or Ostrogradsky type instability in scalar sector coupled to matter.
“However, a very recent study Langlois et al. (2018) showed that mimetic gravity theories can be viewed/formulated as degenerate higher-order scalar theories (DHOST) (Langlois and Noui 2016a) with an extra local gauge symmetry. They study linear perturbations about a homogeneous and isotropic background for all mimetic theories and find that they have either gradient instabilities or an Ostrograd”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Langlois et al. 2018
Cites
Beltrán Jiménez, J., Piazza, F., & Velten, H. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061101 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
“If we decide to be too conservative and ignore the presence of the higher order operators, that would enter naturally from the effective field theory point of view, we can then put very restrictive bounds on the modified gravity theories [275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282].”
Background
- Authors
- Langlois, D., Saito, R., Yamauchi, D., & Noui, K.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Yamaguchi University (JP)
- Kanagawa University (JP)
- Université de Tours (FR)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 061501
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2769605688
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (17K14304, 17K14286)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- GW170817, modified gravity, scalar-tensor gravity, degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories, DHOST, Horndeski theories, beyond Horndeski theories, gravitational wave speed, Vainshtein screening, screening mechanisms, consistency relations, dark energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review