The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of quantum effects inside spherical charged black holes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus far, there is agreement that the expectation value of the quantum stress tensor of a free scalar field diverges at the inner horizon of a RN or Kerr black hole (in D = d + 1 = 4) on approach from the exterior [296][297][298][299], suggesting a type of strong cosmic censorship.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [296]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · cited 1×
“Semiclassical gravity predicts the evaporation of BHs through the emission of Hawking radiation [16, 17].”
BackgroundHAWKING, S. W. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/248030a0 · Cited by 5,669 · cited 1×
“Semiclassical gravity predicts the evaporation of BHs through the emission of Hawking radiation [16, 17].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1016/0375-9601(81)90508-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1796 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.789 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1256 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1554 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4958 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2117 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.084034 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5423 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(77)90508-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.064016 · DOI
- 10.1038/272035a0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084018 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2057 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104028 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.044054 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2490 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.946 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4337 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2188 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(76)90178-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.024033 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084017 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.954 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024025 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory
Kontou, E.-A., & Sanders, K. (2020) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab8fcf · Cited by 223
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Lanir, A., Ori, A., Zilberman, N., Sela, O., Maline, A., & Levi, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-03-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2470-0010
- 2470-0029
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-05-27)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation (1696/15, 600/18)
- Israeli Centers for Research Excellence
- Asher Fund
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review