How Turing parasites expand the computational landscape of digital life
Open accessAbstract
Why are living systems complex? Why does the biosphere contain living beings with complexity features beyond those of the simplest replicators? What kind of evolutionary pressures result in more complex life forms? These are key questions that pervade the problem of how complexity arises in evolution. One particular way of tackling this is grounded in an algorithmic description of life: living organisms can be seen as systems that extract and process information from their surroundings to reduce uncertainty. Here we take this computational approach using a simple bit string model of coevolving agents and their parasites. While agents try to predict their worlds, parasites do the same with their hosts. The result of this process is that, to escape their parasites, the host agents expand their computational complexity despite the cost of maintaining it. This, in turn, is followed by increasingly complex parasitic counterparts. Such arms races display several qualitative phases, from monotonous to punctuated evolution or even ecological collapse. Our minimal model illustrates the relevance of parasites in providing an active mechanism for expanding living complexity beyond simple replicators, suggesting that parasitic agents are likely to be a major evolutionary driver for biological complexity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In silico coevolution models, in vitro evolution and genomic analyses have shown that parasites actively promote diversity and evolvability.
“In silico coevolution models [333,334], in vitro evolution [335,336] and genomic analyses [337,338] have shown that parasites actively promote diversity and evolvability, as illustrated by the phylogenetic trees in figure 9a,b.”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [334]
Cites
The origin of DNA genomes and DNA replication proteins
Forterre, P. (2002) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00360-0 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Coevolution Drives the Emergence of Complex Traits and Promotes Evolvability
Zaman, L., Meyer, J. R., Devangam, S., Bryson, D. M., Lenski, R. E., & Ofria, C. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002023 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
(2018) · doi:10.1201/b22230 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Inevitability of Genetic Parasites
Iranzo, J., Puigbò, P., Lobkovsky, A. E., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2016) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw193 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Along with cognition [24], parasites have been proposed as causal agents that boost biological complexity, grounded in a plethora of studies, particularly regarding viruses [25–27].”
BackgroundNatural selection: a phase transition?
Eigen, M. (2000) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0301-4622(00)00122-8 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I., & Katsnelson, M. I. (2017) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/s13062-017-0202-5 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Joyce, G. F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/420278a · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hickinbotham, S. J., Stepney, S., & Hogeweg, P. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.210441 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“In silico coevolution models [333,334], in vitro evolution [335,336] and genomic analyses [337,338] have shown that parasites actively promote diversity and evolvability, as illustrated by the phylogenetic trees in figure 9 a , b .”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Seoane, L. F., & Solé, R.
- Affiliations
- Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (ES)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2023-10-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 044407-044407
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W3021896555
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FIS2015-67616-P)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (IJC2018-036694-I)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Keywords
- biological complexity, coevolution, arms race, host-parasite interactions, algorithmic complexity, evolutionary phases, ecological collapse, punctuated evolution, origin of life
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Parasites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review