The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nucleation theorems, the statistical mechanics of molecular clusters, and a revision of classical nucleation theory
Abstract
The nucleation theorems relate the temperature and supersaturation dependence of the rate of nucleation of droplets from a metastable vapor phase to properties of the critical molecular cluster, the size that is approximately equally likely to grow or decay. They are derived here using a combination of statistical mechanics and cluster population dynamics, using an arbitrary model cluster definition. The theorems are employed to test the validity of the classical theory of homogeneous nucleation and its ``internally consistent'' form. It is found that the properties of the critical cluster for these models are incorrect, and it emerges that this occurs because the classical theory employs the free energy of a fixed droplet, rather than one free to take any position in space. Thus a term representing positional, or mixing, entropy is missing from the cluster free energy. A revised model is proposed, based on the capillarity approximation but with such a term included, and it is shown that it is fully consistent with the nucleation theorems. The model increases classical rates by factors of approximately ${10}^{4}$--${10}^{6}$. Other nucleation models should be tested for internal consistency using the same methods. Finally, the nucleation theorems are used to extract the excess internal energies of molecular clusters from experimental data for several substances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gas Bubbles in Electrochemical Gas Evolution Reactions
Zhao, X., Ren, H., & Luo, L. (2019) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 · Cited by 457
Recent Advances of Structurally Ordered Intermetallic Nanoparticles for Electrocatalysis
Xiao, W., Lei, W., Gong, M., Xin, H. L., & Wang, D. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b04420 · Cited by 356
Gas Evolution in Water Electrolysis
Kempler, P. A., Coridan, R. H., & Luo, L. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00211 · Cited by 289
Growth of epitaxial graphene: Theory and experiment
Tetlow, H., Posthuma de Boer, J., Ford, I. J., Vvedensky, D. D., Coraux, J., & Kantorovich, L. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.03.003 · Cited by 274
Self-citationA new model for predicting performance of fin-and-tube heat exchanger under frost condition
Cui, J., Li, W. Z., Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. S. (2011) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.11.004 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, I. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5615-5629
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W1976675073
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nucleation theorems, the statistical mechanics of molecular clusters, and a revision of classical nucleation theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.56.5615
- The paper
- Ford, I. J. (1997). Nucleation theorems, the statistical mechanics of molecular clusters, and a revision of classical nucleation theory. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.56.5615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.