Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 957

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis

Open access
Chen, Zhi, Ivanov, Plamen Ch., Hu, Kun, Stanley, H. Eugene·2002·Physical Review E

Abstract

Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a scaling analysis method used to quantify long-range power-law correlations in signals. Many physical and biological signals are "noisy," heterogeneous, and exhibit different types of nonstationarities, which can affect the correlation properties of these signals. We systematically study the effects of three types of nonstationarities often encountered in real data. Specifically, we consider nonstationary sequences formed in three ways: (i) stitching together segments of data obtained from discontinuous experimental recordings, or removing some noisy and unreliable parts from continuous recordings and stitching together the remaining parts-a "cutting" procedure commonly used in preparing data prior to signal analysis; (ii) adding to a signal with known correlations a tunable concentration of random outliers or spikes with different amplitudes; and (iii) generating a signal comprised of segments with different properties-e.g., different standard deviations or different correlation exponents. We compare the difference between the scaling results obtained for stationary correlated signals and correlated signals with these three types of nonstationarities. We find that introducing nonstationarities to stationary correlated signals leads to the appearance of crossovers in the scaling behavior and we study how the characteristics of these crossovers depend on (a) the fraction and size of the parts cut out from the signal, (b) the concentration of spikes and their amplitudes (c) the proportion between segments with different standard deviations or different correlations and (d) the correlation properties of the stationary signal. We show how to develop strategies for preprocessing "raw" data prior to analysis, which will minimize the effects of nonstationarities on the scaling properties of the data, and how to interpret the results of DFA for complex signals with different local characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.65.041107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 957

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z., Ivanov, P. C., Hu, K., & Stanley, H. E.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2002-04-08
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
041107-041107
ISSN
  • 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3787
OpenAlex
W2103297114
Cited by
957
References
1
FWCI
59.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.65.041107
The paper
Chen, Z., Ivanov, P. C., Hu, K., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.65.041107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.