The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attack vulnerability of complex networks
Open accessAbstract
We study the response of complex networks subject to attacks on vertices and edges. Several existing complex network models as well as real-world networks of scientific collaborations and Internet traffic are numerically investigated, and the network performance is quantitatively measured by the average inverse geodesic length and the size of the largest connected subgraph. For each case of attacks on vertices and edges, four different attacking strategies are used: removals by the descending order of the degree and the betweenness centrality, calculated for either the initial network or the current network during the removal procedure. It is found that the removals by the recalculated degrees and betweenness centralities are often more harmful than the attack strategies based on the initial network, suggesting that the network structure changes as important vertices or edges are removed. Furthermore, the correlation between the betweenness centrality and the degree in complex networks is studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Size-dependent degree distribution of a scale-free growing network
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F., & Samukhin, A. N. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.63.062101 · Cited by 311
Cited by
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks
Buldyrev, S. V., Parshani, R., Paul, G., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08932 · Cited by 4,513
Epidemic processes in complex networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P., & Vespignani, A. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925 · Cited by 3,697
Cascade-based attacks on complex networks
Motter, A. E., & Lai, Y.-C. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.065102 · Cited by 1,929
Betweenness centrality in large complex networks
Barthélemy, M. (2004) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00111-4 · Cited by 804
A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals
Williams, R., & Lusseau, D. (2006) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0510 · Cited by 199
Multiple weak hits confuse complex systems: A transcriptional regulatory network as an example
Ágoston, V., Csermely, P., & Pongor, S. (2005) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.71.051909 · Cited by 111
Generative models of rich clubs in Hebbian neuronal networks and large-scale human brain networks
Vértes, P. E., Alexander-Bloch, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0531 · Cited by 50
Disrupting networks of hate: characterising hateful networks and removing critical nodes
Alorainy, W., Burnap, P., Liu, H., Williams, M., & Giommoni, L. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00818-z · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Holme, P., Kim, B. J., Yoon, C. N., & Han, S. K.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-05-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 056109-056109
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W1967385589
- Cited by
- 1,891
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
