The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks
Open accessAbstract
We propose a metric to quantify correlations between earthquakes. The metric consists of a product involving the time interval and spatial distance between two events, as well as the magnitude of the first one. According to this metric, events typically are strongly correlated to only one or a few preceding ones. Thus a classification of events as foreshocks, main shocks, or aftershocks emerges automatically without imposing predetermined space-time windows. In the simplest network construction, each earthquake receives an incoming link from its most correlated predecessor. The number of aftershocks for any event, identified by its outgoing links, is found to be scale free with exponent gamma=2.0(1). The original Omori law with p=1 emerges as a robust feature of seismicity, holding up to years even for aftershock sequences initiated by intermediate magnitude events. The broad distribution of distances between earthquakes and their linked aftershocks suggests that aftershock collection with fixed space windows is not appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
Introduction to Percolation Theory
Stauffer, D., Aharony, A., & Redner, S. (1993) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2808877 · Cited by 6,666
On power-law relationships of the Internet topology
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999) · Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/316188.316229 · Cited by 4,196
The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1579 · Cited by 3,569
Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks
Maslov, S., & Sneppen, K. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065103 · Cited by 3,051
Introduction to Percolation Theory
Blanc, R. (1986) · Contribution of Clusters Physics to Materials Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4374-2_13 · Cited by 2,897
Bak, P. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1 · Cited by 2,809
How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality
Bak, P., & Weissman, M. (1997) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18610 · Cited by 2,699
Cited by
Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature
Marković, D., & Gros, C. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.11.002 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Baiesi, M., & Paczuski, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-06-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 066106-066106
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W1995276147
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.69.066106
- The paper
- Baiesi, M., & Paczuski, M. (2004). Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.066106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.