The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials
Abstract
We discuss the validity of standard retrieval methods that assign bulk electromagnetic properties, such as the electric permittivity epsilon and the magnetic permeability mu, from calculations of the scattering (S) parameters for finite-thickness samples. S-parameter retrieval methods have recently become the principal means of characterizing artificially structured metamaterials, which, by nature, are inherently inhomogeneous. While the unit cell of a metamaterial can be made considerably smaller than the free space wavelength, there remains a significant variation of the phase across the unit cell at operational frequencies in nearly all metamaterial structures reported to date. In this respect, metamaterials do not rigorously satisfy an effective medium limit and are closer conceptually to photonic crystals. Nevertheless, we show here that a modification of the standard S-parameter retrieval procedure yields physically reasonable values for the retrieved electromagnetic parameters, even when there is significant inhomogeneity within the unit cell of the structure. We thus distinguish a metamaterial regime, as opposed to the effective medium or photonic crystal regimes, in which a refractive index can be rigorously established but where the wave impedance can only be approximately defined. We present numerical simulations on typical metamaterial structures to illustrate the modified retrieval algorithm and the impact on the retrieved material parameters. We find that no changes to the standard retrieval procedures are necessary when the inhomogeneous unit cell is symmetric along the propagation axis; however, when the unit cell does not possess this symmetry, a modified procedure--in which a periodic structure is assumed--is required to obtain meaningful electromagnetic material parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens
Pendry, J. B. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3966 · Cited by 12,159
Cited by
Metamaterials: a new frontier of science and technology
Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00184h · Cited by 1,086
Realization of an all-dielectric zero-index optical metamaterial
Moitra, P., Yang, Y., Anderson, Z., Kravchenko, I. I., Briggs, D. P., & Valentine, J. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.214 · Cited by 665
Xie, B.-Y., Su, G.-X., Wang, H.-F., Su, H., Shen, X.-P., Zhan, P., Lu, M.-H., Wang, Z.-L., & Chen, Y.-F. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.233903 · Cited by 594
Liu, R., Cui, T. J., Huang, D., Zhao, B., & Smith, D. R. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.76.026606 · Cited by 217
Self-citationA topology optimization method for design of negative permeability metamaterials
Diaz, A. R., & Sigmund, O. (2010) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0416-y · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, D. R., Vier, D. C., Koschny, T., & Soukoulis, C. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-03-22
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 036617-036617
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W1976370585
- Cited by
- 3,119
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.71.036617
- The paper
- Smith, D. R., Vier, D. C., Koschny, T., & Soukoulis, C. M. (2005). Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.036617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.