The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka-Volterra model
Open accessAbstract
Cyclic dominance of species has been identified as a potential mechanism to maintain biodiversity, see, e.g., B. Kerr, M. A. Riley, M. W. Feldman and B. J. M. Bohannan [Nature 418, 171 (2002)] and B. Kirkup and M. A. Riley [Nature 428, 412 (2004)]. Through analytical methods supported by numerical simulations, we address this issue by studying the properties of a paradigmatic non-spatial three-species stochastic system, namely, the "rock-paper-scissors" or cyclic Lotka-Volterra model. While the deterministic approach (rate equations) predicts the coexistence of the species resulting in regular (yet neutrally stable) oscillations of the population densities, we demonstrate that fluctuations arising in the system with a finite number of agents drastically alter this picture and are responsible for extinction: After long enough time, two of the three species die out. As main findings we provide analytic estimates and numerical computation of the extinction probability at a given time. We also discuss the implications of our results for a broad class of competing population systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
Cited by
Statistical physics of human cooperation
Perc, M., Jordan, J. J., Rand, D. G., Wang, Z., Boccaletti, S., & Szolnoki, A. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.004 · Cited by 1,590
Nonlinear Markov Processes and Kinetic Equations
Kolokoltsov, V. N. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511760303 · Cited by 279
Evolutionary game theory: Theoretical concepts and applications to microbial communities
Frey, E. (2010) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.02.047 · Cited by 273
Self-citationSato, K., & Kaneko, K. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.061909 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichenbach, T., Mobilia, M., & Frey, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-11-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 051907-051907
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2076630747
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka-Volterra model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.74.051907
- The paper
- Reichenbach, T., Mobilia, M., & Frey, E. (2006). Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka-Volterra model. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.74.051907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.