The DOI matches its Crossref record; 302 of the 302 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical physics of human cooperation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Extensive cooperation among unrelated individuals is unique to humans, who often sacrifice personal benefits for the common good and work together to achieve what they are unable to execute alone. The evolutionary success of our species is indeed due, to a large degree, to our unparalleled other-regarding abilities. Yet, a comprehensive understanding of human cooperation remains a formidable challenge. Recent research in the social sciences indicates that it is important to focus on the collective behavior that emerges as the result of the interactions among individuals, groups, and even societies. Non-equilibrium statistical physics, in particular Monte Carlo methods and the theory of collective behavior of interacting particles near phase transition points, has proven to be very valuable for understanding counterintuitive evolutionary outcomes. By treating models of human cooperation as classical spin models, a physicist can draw on familiar settings from statistical physics. However, unlike pairwise interactions among particles that typically govern solid-state physics systems, interactions among humans often involve group interactions, and they also involve a larger number of possible states even for the most simplified description of reality. The complexity of solutions therefore often surpasses that observed in physical systems. Here we review experimental and theoretical research that advances our understanding of human cooperation, focusing on spatial pattern formation, on the spatiotemporal dynamics of observed solutions, and on self-organization that may either promote or hinder socially favorable states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Self-citationTheory of dynamic critical phenomena
Hohenberg, P. C., & Halperin, B. I. (1977) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.435 · Cited by 6,891
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Balafoutas, 2014, Third-party punishment and counter-punishment in one-shot interactions, Econom. Lett., 122, 308, 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.11.028 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.11.028
- Capraro, 2015, Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making, Proc. R Soc. B, 282, 20150237, 10.1098/rspb.2015.0237 · DOI
- Gächter, 2012, Carrot or stick?, Nature, 483, 39, 10.1038/483039a · doi:10.1038/483039a
- Dickman, 2001, First- and second-order phase transitions in a driven lattice gas with nearest-neighbor exclusion, Phys. Rev. E, 64, 016124, 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016124 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016124
- Szolnoki, 2002, Dynamical mean-field approximation for a pair contact process with a particle source, Phys. Rev. E, 66, 057102, 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.057102 · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.057102
- Dickman, 2002, n-site approximations and coherent-anomaly-method analysis for a stochastic sandpile, Phys. Rev. E, 66, 036122, 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.036122 · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.036122
- Binder, 1980, Phase diagrams and critical behavior in ising square lattices with nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interactions, Phys. Rev. B, 21, 1941, 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.1941 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.21.1941
- Vazquez, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 235702, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.235702 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.235702
- Noest, 1988, Phys. Rev. B, 38, 2715, 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.2715 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.2715
- Wu, 2005, Spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with volunteering in Newman-Watts small-world networks, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 037103, 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.037103 · doi:10.1103/physreve.71.037103
- Laird, 2008, Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks?, Ecology, 89, 237, 10.1890/07-0117.1 · doi:10.1890/07-0117.1
Cited by
Dynamics on higher-order networks: a review
Majhi, S., Perc, M., & Ghosh, D. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0043 · Cited by 561
Self-citationNetwork science of biological systems at different scales: A review
Gosak, M., Markovič, R., Dolenšek, J., Slak Rupnik, M., Marhl, M., Stožer, A., & Perc, M. (2018) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.003 · Cited by 419
Self-citationEvolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks
Alvarez-Rodriguez, U., Battiston, F., de Arruda, G. F., Moreno, Y., Perc, M., & Latora, V. (2021) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-214990 · Cited by 403
Self-citationXia, C., Wang, J., Perc, M., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.05.002 · Cited by 339
Self-citationEvolution of cooperation in stochastic games
Hilbe, C., Šimsa, Š., Chatterjee, K., & Nowak, M. A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0277-x · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Perc, M., Jordan, J. J., Rand, D. G., Wang, Z., Boccaletti, S., & Szolnoki, A.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 687
- Pages
- 1-51
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2618208446
- Cited by
- 1,590
- References
- 302
- FWCI
- 408.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 437 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Funders
- Slovenian Research Agency (J1-7009, P5-0027)
- Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF0209)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (D17AC00005)
- National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFB0800602)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471299)
- Hungarian National Research Fund (K-120785)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical physics of human cooperation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.004
- The paper
- Perc, M., Jordan, J. J., Rand, D. G., Wang, Z., Boccaletti, S., & Szolnoki, A. (2017). Statistical physics of human cooperation. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.