Cited by 107Complex Network Analysis TechniquesOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

Coevolutionary networks with homophily and heterophily

Kimura, Daichi, Hayakawa, Yoshinori·2008·Physical Review E

Abstract

We have investigated a simple coevolutionary network model incorporating three processes-changes of opinions, homophily, and heterophily. In this model, each node holds one of G opinions and changes its opinion, as in the voter model. Homophily is the tendency for connections to form between individuals of the same opinions and heterophily is the opposite effect. If there is no heterophily, this model corresponds to the Holme and Newman model [Phys. Rev. E 74, 056108 (2006)]. We show that the behavior of this model without heterophily can be understood in terms of a mean field approximation. We also find that this model with heterophily exhibits topologically complicated behaviors such as the small-world property.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.78.016103

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informational influence theory for group polarization holds that agents with moderate opinions may become extreme while interacting in a group.

    “This mechanism builds on the idea of informational influence theory [38] for the phenomenon of group polarization, where agents with moderate opinions may become extreme while interacting in a group [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimura, D., & Hayakawa, Y.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2008-07-07
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
016103-016103
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2040467035
Cited by
107
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
homophily, heterophily, opinion dynamics, voter model, mean-field approximation, small-world networks, network topology, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review