Cited by 789Complex Systems and Time Series AnalysisComplex Network Analysis TechniquesStatistical Mechanics and Entropy

Horizontal visibility graphs: Exact results for random time series

Open access
Luque, B., Lacasa, L., Ballesteros, F., Luque, J.·2009·Physical Review E

Abstract

The visibility algorithm has been recently introduced as a mapping between time series and complex networks. This procedure allows us to apply methods of complex network theory for characterizing time series. In this work we present the horizontal visibility algorithm, a geometrically simpler and analytically solvable version of our former algorithm, focusing on the mapping of random series (series of independent identically distributed random variables). After presenting some properties of the algorithm, we present exact results on the topological properties of graphs associated with random series, namely, the degree distribution, the clustering coefficient, and the mean path length. We show that the horizontal visibility algorithm stands as a simple method to discriminate randomness in time series since any random series maps to a graph with an exponential degree distribution of the shape P(k)=(1/3)(2/3)(k-2), independent of the probability distribution from which the series was generated. Accordingly, visibility graphs with other P(k) are related to nonrandom series. Numerical simulations confirm the accuracy of the theorems for finite series. In a second part, we show that the method is able to distinguish chaotic series from independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) theory, studying the following situations: (i) noise-free low-dimensional chaotic series, (ii) low-dimensional noisy chaotic series, even in the presence of large amounts of noise, and (iii) high-dimensional chaotic series (coupled map lattice), without needs for additional techniques such as surrogate data or noise reduction methods. Finally, heuristic arguments are given to explain the topological properties of chaotic series, and several sequences that are conjectured to be random are analyzed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.80.046103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vector visibility graph (VVG) algorithm extends the univariate visibility graph concept to multivariate time series data.

    “The vector visibility graph (VVG) algorithm [25] extends the univariate visibility graph [22], [24] concept to multivariate time series data”

    From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The visibility graph transformation supports both scalar and vector representations, with applications spanning time series analysis and language processing.

    “This simple yet versatile transformation supports both scalar [22], [24] and vector representations [25], with applications spanning time series analysis and language processing [26], [27].”

    From Emotion Classification With Visibility Graphs (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. L. Lacasa, B. Luque, F. Ballesteros, J. Luque and J.C. Nuno, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, no. 13 (2008) 4972-4975.
  2. M. de Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. Overmans and O. Schwarzkopf, in Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, pp. 307-317 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
  3. M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Review 45 (2003) 167-256.
  4. S. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F Mendes, Advances in Physics 51, 4 (2002).
  5. X. Xu, J. Zhang, M. Small, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 50 (2008).
  6. B. Bollobás, Modern Graph Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York Inc. (1998).
  7. A.L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
  8. B.B Mandelbrot and J.W Van Ness, SIAM Review 10, 4 (1968) 422-437.
  9. C. Liu, W.X. Zhou, and W.K. Yuan, Arxiv preprint arXiv:0905.1831 (2009). · arXiv
  10. E.A. Fogarty, Network Analysis of Hurricanes Affecting the United States, PhD dissertation (2009) etd-03232009-110339.
  11. Y. Yang, J. Wang, H. Yang, J. Mang, Physica A (2009) (in press).
  12. E.G. Altmann and H. Kantz, Phys. Rev. E 71, 056106 (2005).
  13. M. Casdagli, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 54, 2 (1991) pp. 303-328.
  14. E. Ravasz, A.L. Somera, D.A. Mongru, Z.N. Oltvai, A.-L. Barabasi, Science 297, 1551 (2002).
  15. P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 448 (1983).
  16. G. Sugihara and R.M. May, Nature 344, 734 (1990).
  17. A. A. Tsonis and J. B. Elsner, Nature 358, 217 (1992).
  18. D.T. Kaplan and L. Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 4 (1992).
  19. O.A. Rosso, H.A. Larrondo, M.T. Martin, A. Plastino, and M.A. Fuentes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 154102 (2007).
  20. H. Kantz and T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cambridge UNiversity press, Cambridge, 2003).
  21. E.J. Kostelich and T. Schreiber, Phys. Rev. E 48, 1752 (1993).
  22. M. Bauer, H. Heng and W. Martienssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4 (1993).
  23. M.B. Kennel and S. Isabelle, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6 (1992).
  24. D. Prichard and J. Theiler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 7 (1994).
  25. D. Kaplan and L. Glass, Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics, Springer-Verlag (1996).
  26. S.C. Manrubia, A.S. Mikhailov, and D.H. Zanette, Emergence of Dynamical Order: Synchronization Phenomena in Com- plex Systems, World Scientific Publishing Co. (2004).
  27. M. Benedicks and L. Carleson, Ann. Math. 133 (1991) pp: 73169, L.-.S. Young, Ann. Math. 147, 3 (1998) pp: 585-650, M. Hirata, B. Saussol, and S. Vaienti, Comm. Math. Phys. 206 (1999) pp: 33-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luque, B., Lacasa, L., Ballesteros, F., & Luque, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2009-10-07
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
046103-046103
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2093433505
Cited by
789
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 27
FWCI
35.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
Keywords
horizontal visibility graph, visibility algorithms, random time series, degree distribution, clustering coefficient, average path length, chaotic time series, coupled map lattices, surrogate data
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Nerve Net, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review