Cited by 106Wireless Signal Modulation ClassificationAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

AvgNet: Adaptive Visibility Graph Neural Network and Its Application in Modulation Classification

Xuan, Qi, Zhou, Jinchao, Qiu, Kunfeng, Chen, Zhuangzhi, Xu, Dongwei, Zheng, Shilian, Yang, Xiaoniu·2022·IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Abstract

Our digital world is full of time series and graphs which capture the various aspects of many complex systems. Traditionally, there are respective methods in processing these two different types of data, e.g., Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Graph Neural Network (GNN), while in recent years, time series could be mapped to graphs by using the techniques such as Visibility Graph (VG), which simultaneously captures relevant aspects of both local and global dynamics in an easy way, so that researchers can use graph algorithms to mine the knowledge in time series and gain special latent graph representation features. Such mapping methods establish a bridge between time series and graphs, and have high potential to facilitate the analysis of various real-world time series. However, the VG method and its variants are just based on fixed rules and thus lack of flexibility, largely limiting their application in reality. In this paper, we propose an Adaptive Visibility Graph (AVG) algorithm that can adaptively map time series into graphs, based on which we further establish an end-to-end classification framework AvgNet, by utilizing GNN model DiffPool as the classifier. We then adopt AvgNet for radio signal modulation classification which is an important task in the field of wireless communication. The simulations validate that AvgNet outperforms a series of advanced deep learning methods, achieving the state-of-the-art performance in this task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnse.2022.3146836

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1109/lwc.2020.2999453 · DOI
  2. OShea, 2016, Radio machine learning dataset generation with GNU radio

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xuan, Q., Zhou, J., Qiu, K., Chen, Z., Xu, D., Zheng, S., & Yang, X.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
  • Science and Technology on Communication Information Security Control Laboratory, Jiaxing, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
Published
2022-05-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
1516-1526
ISSN
  • 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-329X
OpenAlex
W4225992487
Cited by
106
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2001, 61973273)
  • Key R&D Programs of Zhejiang (2022C01018)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR19F030001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
visibility graph, graph neural networks, wireless communication, time series classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review