The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficiently inferring community structure in bipartite networks
Open accessAbstract
Bipartite networks are a common type of network data in which there are two types of vertices, and only vertices of different types can be connected. While bipartite networks exhibit community structure like their unipartite counterparts, existing approaches to bipartite community detection have drawbacks, including implicit parameter choices, loss of information through one-mode projections, and lack of interpretability. Here we solve the community detection problem for bipartite networks by formulating a bipartite stochastic block model, which explicitly includes vertex type information and may be trivially extended to k-partite networks. This bipartite stochastic block model yields a projection-free and statistically principled method for community detection that makes clear assumptions and parameter choices and yields interpretable results. We demonstrate this model's ability to efficiently and accurately find community structure in synthetic bipartite networks with known structure and in real-world bipartite networks with unknown structure, and we characterize its performance in practical contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks
Clauset, A., Moore, C., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06830 · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationPerformance of modularity maximization in practical contexts
Good, B. H., de Montjoye, Y.-A., & Clauset, A. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.046106 · Cited by 937
Self-citationFood web models: a plea for groups.
Allesina, S., & Pascual, M. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01321.x · Cited by 149
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics
Battiston, F., Cencetti, G., Iacopini, I., Latora, V., Lucas, M., Patania, A., Young, J.-G., & Petri, G. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004 · Cited by 1,602
Structure and inference in annotated networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Clauset, A. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11863 · Cited by 379
Self-citationConfiguring Random Graph Models with Fixed Degree Sequences
Fosdick, B. K., Larremore, D. B., Nishimura, J., & Ugander, J. (2018) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/16m1087175 · Cited by 246
Self-citationSubspace Estimation from Unbalanced and Incomplete Data Matrices: 𝓁2, ∞ Statistical Guarantees
Cai, C., Li, G., Chi, Y., Poor, H. V., & Chen, Y. (2021) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/20-aos1986 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Larremore, D. B., Clauset, A., & Jacobs, A. Z.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-07-10
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012805-012805
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W1987643017
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiently inferring community structure in bipartite networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.90.012805
- The paper
- Larremore, D. B., Clauset, A., & Jacobs, A. Z. (2014). Efficiently inferring community structure in bipartite networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.90.012805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.