Cited by 149Complex Network Analysis TechniquesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Food web models: a plea for groups.

Open access
Allesina, Stefano, Pascual, Mercedes·2009·Ecology Letters

Abstract

The concept of a group is ubiquitous in biology. It underlies classifications in evolution and ecology, including those used to describe phylogenetic levels, the habitat and functional roles of organisms in ecosystems. Surprisingly, this concept is not explicitly included in simple models for the structure of food webs, the ecological networks formed by consumer–resource interactions. We present here the simplest possible model based on groups, and show that it performs substantially better than current models at predicting the structure of large food webs. Our group‐based model can be applied to different types of biological and non‐biological networks, and for the first time merges in the same framework two important notions in network theory: that of compartments (sets of highly interacting nodes) and that of roles (sets of nodes that have similar interaction patterns). This model provides a basis to examine the significance of groups in biological networks and to develop more accurate models for ecological network structure. It is especially relevant at a time when a new generation of empirical data is providing increasingly large food webs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01321.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compartmentalisation is commonly observed in complex ecological networks and is thought to enhance their stability and persistence.

    “a feature commonly observed in complex ecological networks and thought to enhance their stability and persistence”

    From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Allesina and Pascual 2009

    The Discussion (page not available) says that all food webs analysed had very few densely connected communities and that trophic roles appeared more influential than communities. This runs counter to the claim that compartmentalisation is commonly observed. The paper says the dynamical consequences of compartments can be studied, but does not say they enhance stability or persistence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The group model, known as a stochastic block model in the statistical literature, was previously treated in a maximum-likelihood framework.

    “The group model [12], known as a stochastic block model in the statistical literature [57], was previously treated in a maximum-likelihood framework.”
  • Compartments alone do not account for much of the topological structure in food webs.

    “Although compartmental structure may be significant at one scale of analysis, compartments alone do not account for much of the topological structure in food webs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allesina, S., & Pascual, M.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
652-662
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2097186933
Cited by
149
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
food web structure, ecological networks, consumer-resource interactions, compartments, network roles, biological networks
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Models, Theoretical, Food Chain, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review