Cited by 63Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsTheoretical and Computational Physics

Completeness of the Classical 2D Ising Model and Universal Quantum Computation

Open access
Van den Nest, M., Dür, W., Briegel, H. J.·2008·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We prove that the 2D Ising model is complete in the sense that the partition function of any classical q-state spin model (on an arbitrary graph) can be expressed as a special instance of the partition function of a 2D Ising model with complex inhomogeneous couplings and external fields. In the case where the original model is an Ising or Potts-type model, we find that the corresponding 2D square lattice requires only polynomially more spins with respect to the original one, and we give a constructive method to map such models to the 2D Ising model. For more general models the overhead in system size may be exponential. The results are established by connecting classical spin models with measurement-based quantum computation and invoking the universality of the 2D cluster states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.100.110501

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The multiparticle entangled state |ψ_L> encodes the interaction pattern and is a graph state.

    “The multiparticle entangled state | ψ L 〉 95 encodes the interaction pattern and is a graph state 21 (see Fig. 1).”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

  • The Ising model on an arbitrary lattice L can be mapped to an MQC model in which the entangled resource is determined by the geometry of L.

    “The connection between MQC and the Ising model is given by a mapping of the Ising model on an arbitrary lattice L to an MQC model where the entangled resource is determined by the geometry of L ,”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

  • The efficient classical simulation of MQC on stabilizer states with bounded tree-width yields a novel classical algorithm to efficiently calculate the partition function on (inhomogeneous) q-state spin models on tree-like graphs with or without magnetic fields.

    “In turn, the efficient classical simulation of MQC on stabilizer states with bounded tree-width 94 , as demonstrated in 91 , yields a novel classical algorithm to efficiently calculate the partition function on (inhomogenous) q -state spin models on tree-like-graphs with or without magnetic fields 95,96 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

  • The universality of 2D-cluster states was used to prove that the 2D Ising model with magnetic fields is 'complete' in the sense that the partition function of any q-state spin model on an arbitrary lattice can be expressed as a special instance of the partition function of the 2D Ising model in a complex parameter regime.

    “For example, in 95 the universality of the 2D-cluster states was used to prove that the 2D Ising model with magnetic fields is 'complete' in the sense that the partition function of any q -state spin model on an arbitrary lattice can be expressed as a special instance of the partition function of the 2D Ising model (in a complex parameter regime).”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

  • These connections enable one to phrase statistical physics problems naturally in a quantum mechanical setting.

    “For one, these connections enable one to phrase statistical physics problems naturally in a quantum mechanical setting 87,92,95,96,99-102 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]F. Verstraete et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 220601 (2006); R. D. Somma, C. D. Batista, G. Ortiz, quant-ph/0609216; D. A. Lidar, New J. Phys. 6 , 167 (2004); D. A. Lidar and O. Biham, Phys. Rev. E 56 , 3661 (1997); D. Aharonov et al. , quant-ph/0702008. · arXiv

Authors
Van den Nest, M., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J.
Affiliations
Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2008-03-17
Volume
100
Issue
11
Pages
110501-110501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1971755522
Cited by
63
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
two-dimensional Ising model, completeness, partition function, classical spin systems, Potts model, complex coupling, external fields, measurement-based quantum computation, cluster states, universal quantum computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review