The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Limits on Coupling of Fundamental Constants to Gravity UsingSr87Optical Lattice Clocks
Open accessAbstract
The $^{1}S_{0}$-$^{3}P_{0}$ clock transition frequency ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\mathrm{Sr}}$ in neutral $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$ has been measured relative to the Cs standard by three independent laboratories in Boulder, Paris, and Tokyo over the last three years. The agreement on the $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}$ level makes ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\mathrm{Sr}}$ the best agreed-upon optical atomic frequency. We combine periodic variations in the $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$ clock frequency with $^{199}\mathrm{Hg}^{+}$ and H-maser data to test local position invariance by obtaining the strongest limits to date on gravitational-coupling coefficients for the fine-structure constant $\ensuremath{\alpha}$, electron-proton mass ratio $\ensuremath{\mu}$, and light quark mass. Furthermore, after $^{199}\mathrm{Hg}^{+}$, $^{171}\mathrm{Yb}^{+}$, and H, we add $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$ as the fourth optical atomic clock species to enhance constraints on yearly drifts of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Search for Variations of Fundamental Constants using Atomic Fountain Clocks
Marion, H., Pereira Dos Santos, F., Abgrall, M., Zhang, S., Sortais, Y., Bize, S., Maksimovic, I., Calonico, D., Grünert, J., Mandache, C., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.150801 · Cited by 298
Self-citation
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationAn Atomic Clock with 10 –18 Instability
Hinkley, N., Sherman, J. A., Phillips, N. B., Schioppo, M., Lemke, N. D., Beloy, K., Pizzocaro, M., Oates, C. W., & Ludlow, A. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240420 · Cited by 817
Self-citationThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-4 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Blatt, S., Ludlow, A. D., Campbell, G. K., Thomsen, J. W., Zelevinsky, T., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Baillard, X., Fouché, M., Le Targat, R., Brusch, A., Lemonde, P., Takamoto, M., Hong, F.-L., Katori, H., & Flambaum, V. V.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-04-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 140801-140801
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2043307605
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Limits on Coupling of Fundamental Constants to Gravity UsingSr87Optical Lattice Clocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.100.140801
- The paper
- Blatt, S., Ludlow, A. D., Campbell, G. K., Thomsen, J. W., Zelevinsky, T., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Baillard, X., Fouché, M., Le Targat, R., Brusch, A., Lemonde, P., Takamoto, M., Hong, F.-L., Katori, H., & Flambaum, V. V. (2008). New Limits on Coupling of Fundamental Constants to Gravity UsingSr87Optical Lattice Clocks. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.140801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.