Cited by 130

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asymptotic Teleportation Scheme as a Universal Programmable Quantum Processor

Ishizaka, Satoshi, Hiroshima, Tohya·2008·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.101.240501

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current record for the longest teleportation distance is held by Ren et al., who teleported single-photon qubits from a ground observatory to a satellite 1400 km high in atmosphere.

    “Today the current record for the longest distance is kept by Ren et al. who teleported single-photon qubits from a ground observatory to a satellite 1400 km high in atmosphere [351].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [351]

  • Two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication and decoherence-free subspaces, or employing quantum repeaters.

    “Notwithstanding, two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication [43,96,105,348,350,351,393-399] and decoherencefree subspaces [42,116,385,386,[388][389][390][391], or employing quantum repeaters.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [351]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.321 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.047905 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.190401 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032306 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022343 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.090401 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022345 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.034304 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137901 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1888 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/09500349414552221 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF02435921 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.146 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TIT.2003.820050 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TIT.2004.828070 · DOI
  16. S. Boyd, 2004, Convex Optimization, 10.1017/CBO9780511804441 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/TIT.2003.809510 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2261 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/18.651037 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ishizaka, S., & Hiroshima, T.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2008-12-12
Volume
101
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
130
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review