Cited by 531Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Realization of a Quantum Walk with One and Two Trapped Ions

Open access
Zähringer, F., Kirchmair, G., Gerritsma, R., Solano, E., Blatt, R., Roos, C. F.·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrate a quantum walk on a line in phase space using one and two trapped ions. A walk with up to 23 steps is realized by subjecting an ion to state-dependent displacement operations interleaved with quantum coin tossing operations. To analyze the ion's motional state after each step we apply a technique that directly maps the probability density distribution onto the ion's internal state. The measured probability distributions and the position's second moment clearly show the nonclassical character of the quantum walk. To further highlight the difference between the classical (random) and the quantum walk, we demonstrate the reversibility of the latter. Finally, we extend the quantum walk by using two ions, giving the walker the additional possibility to stay instead of taking a step.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.104.100503

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In trapped ions, a DQW has been implemented by mapping position space to locations in phase space given by the degrees of freedom associated with the harmonic motion of the ion in the trap.

    “In trapped ions, a DQW has been implemented by mapping position space to locations in phase space given by the degrees of freedom associated with the harmonic motion of the ion in the trap33–35.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]K. Pearson, Nature 72 , 294 (1905).
  2. [20]M. Hillery, D. Reitzner, and V. Buzek, arXiv:0911.1102 (2009). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zähringer, F., Kirchmair, G., Gerritsma, R., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F.
Affiliations
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
100503-100503
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1998160863
Cited by
531
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 39
FWCI
44.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum walks, trapped ions, phase space, nonclassicality, reversibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review