Cited by 480Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Simulation of Strong System-Environment Interactions

Open access

Abstract

Multicomponent quantum systems in strong interaction with their environment are receiving increasing attention due to their importance in a variety of contexts, ranging from solid state quantum information processing to the quantum dynamics of biomolecular aggregates. Unfortunately, these systems are difficult to simulate as the system-bath interactions cannot be treated perturbatively and standard approaches are invalid or inefficient. Here we combine the time-dependent density matrix renormalization group with techniques from the theory of orthogonal polynomials to provide an efficient method for simulating open quantum systems, including spin-boson models and their generalizations to multicomponent systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.105.050404

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 480

Metadata

Authors
Prior, J., Chin, A. W., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (ES)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
050404-050404
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2007593774
Cited by
480
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
open quantum systems, system-bath interaction, time-dependent density matrix renormalization group, orthogonal polynomials, spin-boson model, quantum dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review