Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First Dark Matter Results from the XENON100 Experiment

Open access
Aprile, E., Arisaka, K., Arneodo, F., Askin, A., Baudis, L., Behrens, A., Bokeloh, K., Brown, E., Cardoso, J. M. R., Choi, B., Cline, D. B., Fattori, S., Ferella, A. D., Giboni, K.-L., Kish, A., Lam, C. W., Lamblin, J., Lang, R. F., Lim, K. E., Lopes, J. A. M., Marrodán Undagoitia, T., Mei, Y., Melgarejo Fernandez, A. J., Ni, K., Oberlack, U., Orrigo, S. E. A., Pantic, E., Plante, G., Ribeiro, A. C. C., Santorelli, R., dos Santos, J. M. F., Schumann, M., Shagin, P., Teymourian, A., Thers, D., Tziaferi, E., Wang, H., Weinheimer, C.·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The XENON100 experiment, in operation at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso in Italy, is designed to search for dark matter weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) scattering off 62 kg of liquid xenon in an ultralow background dual-phase time projection chamber. In this Letter, we present first dark matter results from the analysis of 11.17 live days of nonblind data, acquired in October and November 2009. In the selected fiducial target of 40 kg, and within the predefined signal region, we observe no events and hence exclude spin-independent WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering cross sections above 3.4 × 10⁻⁴⁴ cm² for 55 GeV/c² WIMPs at 90% confidence level. Below 20 GeV/c², this result constrains the interpretation of the CoGeNT and DAMA signals as being due to spin-independent, elastic, light mass WIMP interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.105.131302

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Aprile, E., Arisaka, K., Arneodo, F., Askin, A., Baudis, L., Behrens, A., Bokeloh, K., Brown, E., Cardoso, J. M. R., Choi, B., Cline, D. B., Fattori, S., Ferella, A. D., Giboni, K.-L., Kish, A., Lam, C. W., Lamblin, J., Lang, R. F., Lim, K. E., Lopes, J. A. M., Marrodán Undagoitia, T., Mei, Y., Melgarejo Fernandez, A. J., Ni, K., Oberlack, U., Orrigo, S. E. A., Pantic, E., Plante, G., Ribeiro, A. C. C., Santorelli, R., dos Santos, J. M. F., Schumann, M., Shagin, P., Teymourian, A., Thers, D., Tziaferi, E., Wang, H., & Weinheimer, C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-09-20
Volume
105
Issue
13
Pages
131302-131302
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2068736126
Cited by
431
References
8
FWCI
63.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First Dark Matter Results from the XENON100 Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.105.131302
The paper
Aprile, E., Arisaka, K., Arneodo, F., Askin, A., Baudis, L., Behrens, A., Bokeloh, K., Brown, E., Cardoso, J. M. R., Choi, B., Cline, D. B., Fattori, S., Ferella, A. D., Giboni, K.-L., Kish, A., Lam, C. W., Lamblin, J., Lang, R. F., Lim, K. E., . . . Weinheimer, C. (2010). First Dark Matter Results from the XENON100 Experiment. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.105.131302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.