Cited by 96Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Mimicking the Probability Distribution of a Two-Dimensional Grover Walk with a Single-Qubit Coin

Open access
Di Franco, C., Mc Gettrick, M., Busch, Th.·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The nonlocalized case of the spatial density probability of the two-dimensional Grover walk can be obtained using only a two-dimensional coin space and a quantum walk in alternate directions. This significantly reduces the resources necessary for its feasible experimental realization. We present a formal proof of this correspondence and analyze the behavior of the coin-position entanglement as well as the x-y spatial entanglement in our scheme with respect to the Grover one. Our scheme allows us to entangle the two orthogonal directions of the walk more efficiently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.106.080502

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implemented split-step quantum walk is proved to realize the Grover search algorithm in the high step-number limit.

    “Here we implement a different split-step quantum walk, that is proved to realize the Grover search algorithm in the high step-number limit 53 .”

    From Quantum walks of two correlated photons in a 2D synthetic lattice (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    The paper’s proof shows that its alternate-direction walk reproduces the Grover walk’s spatial probability distribution for specified initial conditions. It also says the Grover walk can be used to implement two-dimensional Grover search, but it does not prove that the alternate walk realizes the search algorithm in a high-step-number limit. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. H. C. Berg, Random Walks in Biology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).
  2. J. Kempe, Contemp. Phys. 44, 307 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  3. B. C. Travaglione and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032310 (2002); · DOI · Paper page
  4. W. Du ¨r et al., ibid. 66, 052319 (2002); · DOI · Paper page
  5. Z. Zhao et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0212149; · arXiv
  6. B. C. Sanders et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 042305 (2003); · DOI
  7. H. Jeong, M. Paternostro, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 69, 012310 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  8. K. Eckert et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 012327 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  9. R. P. Feynman and A. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).
  10. S. E. Venegas-Andraca and S. Bose, arXiv:0901.3946; · arXiv
  11. S. K. Goya and C. M. Chandrashekar, J. Phys. A 43, 235303 (2010). · DOI
  12. R. Horodecki et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  13. H. Lee, Y.-C. Cheng, and G. R. Fleming, Science 316, 1462 (2007); · DOI
  14. M. Mohseni et al., J. Chem. Phys. 129, 174106 (2008); · DOI · Paper page
  15. M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, New J. Phys. 10, 113019 (2008); · DOI · Paper page
  16. J. Cai, G. G. Guerreschi, and H.-J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 220502 (2010). · DOI
  17. M. Karski et al., Science 325, 174 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  18. T. D. Mackay et al., J. Phys. A 35, 2745 (2002); · DOI · Paper page
  19. A. C. Oliveira, R. Portugal, and R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. A 74, 012312 (2006). · DOI
  20. A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and A. Rivosh, in Proc. 16th ACM-SIAM SODA, Vancouver (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2005), p. 1099;
  21. A. Tulsi, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012310 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  22. N. Inui, Y. Konishi, and N. Konno, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052323 (2004); · DOI
  23. M. S ˇtefan ˇa ´k, T. Kiss, and I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032306 (2008). · DOI
  24. I. Carneiro et al., New J. Phys. 7, 156 (2005); · DOI
  25. G. Abal et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 042302 (2006); · DOI
  26. M. Annabestani, M. R. Abolhasani, and G. Abal, J. Phys. A 43, 075301 (2010). · DOI
  27. S. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. A 68, 062304 (2003). · DOI
  28. K. Watabe et al., Phys. Rev. A 77, 062331 (2008). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Franco, C., Mc Gettrick, M., & Busch, T.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-02-24
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
080502-080502
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2070072241
Cited by
96
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
  • Science Foundation Ireland (05/IN/I852)
  • Irish Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
Grover walk, two-dimensional quantum walk, spatial entanglement
MeSH terms
Numismatics, Probability, Quantum Theory, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review