The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Measurement of Quantum Dynamics via Compressive Sensing
Open accessAbstract
The resources required to characterize the dynamics of engineered quantum systems--such as quantum computers and quantum sensors--grow exponentially with system size. Here we adapt techniques from compressive sensing to exponentially reduce the experimental configurations required for quantum process tomography. Our method is applicable to processes that are nearly sparse in a certain basis and can be implemented using only single-body preparations and measurements. We perform efficient, high-fidelity estimation of process matrices of a photonic two-qubit logic gate. The database is obtained under various decoherence strengths. Our technique is both accurate and noise robust, thus removing a key roadblock to the development and scaling of quantum technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
An Introduction To Compressive Sampling
Candes, E. J., & Wakin, M. B. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2007.914731 · Cited by 10,017
The Theory of Open Quantum Systems
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 · Cited by 5,938
Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499
Self-citationRealization of quantum process tomography in NMR
Childs, A. M., Chuang, I. L., & Leung, D. W. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012314 · Cited by 205
Quantum process tomography of the quantum Fourier transform
Weinstein, Y. S., Havel, T. F., Emerson, J., Boulant, N., Saraceno, M., Lloyd, S., & Cory, D. G. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1785151 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Quantum principal component analysis
Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3029 · Cited by 1,385
Self-citationQuantum Algorithm for Data Fitting
Wiebe, N., Braun, D., & Lloyd, S. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.050505 · Cited by 528
Direct Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements
Flammia, S. T., & Liu, Y.-K. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.230501 · Cited by 449
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions
Agnew, M., Leach, J., McLaren, M., Roux, F. S., & Boyd, R. W. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.062101 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Shabani, A., Kosut, R. L., Mohseni, M., Rabitz, H., Broome, M. A., Almeida, M. P., Fedrizzi, A., & White, A. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-03-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 100401-100401
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2051669075
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Measurement of Quantum Dynamics via Compressive Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.106.100401
- The paper
- Shabani, A., Kosut, R. L., Mohseni, M., Rabitz, H., Broome, M. A., Almeida, M. P., Fedrizzi, A., & White, A. G. (2011). Efficient Measurement of Quantum Dynamics via Compressive Sensing. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.100401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
