The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Klein Tunneling of a Quasirelativistic Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Lattice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature, quantum simulations such as ours directly realize Dirac-boson systems in the laboratory.
“While the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature, quantum simulations such as ours directly realize Dirac-boson systems in the laboratory [12,29], permitting access to new classes of experimental systems.”
From Direct observation of zitterbewegung in a Bose–Einstein condensate (2013) · cites this paper as [12]
The paper’s discussion of its Dirac-like Hamiltonian says that the optical-lattice experiment uses bosons and simulates relativistic dynamics, supporting the laboratory-simulation part of the claim. Our copy does not state the broader assertion that the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature. The indexed copy labels these passages “Abstract” and provides no page number. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe resulting cat-like state was previously predicted as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field, but has not been characterized in previous simulations.
“The resulting cat-like state was previously predicted to exist as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field [49], but has not been characterized in previous simulations [50,51].”
From Revealing inherent quantum interference and entanglement of a Dirac particle (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene
Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys384 · Cited by 3,896
Quantum interference and Klein tunnelling in graphene heterojunctions
Young, A. F., & Kim, P. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1198 · Cited by 1,183
Evidence for Klein Tunneling in Graphene p − n Junctions
Stander, N., Huard, B., & Goldhaber-Gordon, D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.026807 · Cited by 792
Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation
Gerritsma, R., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08688 · Cited by 725
Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion
Lamata, L., León, J., Schätz, T., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.253005 · Cited by 300
Quantum Simulation of the Klein Paradox with Trapped Ions
Gerritsma, R., Lanyon, B. P., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Hempel, C., Casanova, J., García-Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060503 · Cited by 204
Klein tunneling and Dirac potentials in trapped ions
Casanova, J., García-Ripoll, J. J., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., & Solano, E. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.020101 · Cited by 86
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1007/BF01339716 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Bjorken, 1964, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, 10.1063/1.3047288 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nnano.2009.71 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.075102 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.011802 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.153002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.190403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.063622 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.190405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.033601 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.30.24 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.073603 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3572 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.2249 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct observation of zitterbewegung in a Bose–Einstein condensate
LeBlanc, L. J., Beeler, M. C., Jiménez-García, K., Perry, A. R., Sugawa, S., Williams, R. A., & Spielman, I. B. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073011 · Cited by 186
Quantum simulations of relativistic quantum physics in circuit QED
Pedernales, J. S., Di Candia, R., Ballester, D., & Solano, E. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/055008 · Cited by 40
Optical simulation of the free Dirac equation
Silva, T. L., Taillebois, E. R. F., Gomes, R. M., Walborn, S. P., & Avelar, A. T. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022332 · Cited by 14
Revealing inherent quantum interference and entanglement of a Dirac particle
Ning, W., Zheng, R.-H., Xia, Y., Xu, K., Li, H., Zheng, D., Fan, H., Wu, F., Yang, Z.-B., & Zheng, S.-B. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00770-0 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Salger, T., Grossert, C., Kling, S., & Weitz, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-12-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 24
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review