Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Klein Tunneling of a Quasirelativistic Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Lattice

Salger, Tobias, Grossert, Christopher, Kling, Sebastian, Weitz, Martin·2011·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.107.240401

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature, quantum simulations such as ours directly realize Dirac-boson systems in the laboratory.

    “While the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature, quantum simulations such as ours directly realize Dirac-boson systems in the laboratory [12,29], permitting access to new classes of experimental systems.”

    From Direct observation of zitterbewegung in a Bose–Einstein condensate (2013) · cites this paper as [12]

    The paper’s discussion of its Dirac-like Hamiltonian says that the optical-lattice experiment uses bosons and simulates relativistic dynamics, supporting the laboratory-simulation part of the claim. Our copy does not state the broader assertion that the Dirac equation generally applies only to fermionic systems in nature. The indexed copy labels these passages “Abstract” and provides no page number. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The resulting cat-like state was previously predicted as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field, but has not been characterized in previous simulations.

    “The resulting cat-like state was previously predicted to exist as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field [49], but has not been characterized in previous simulations [50,51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1007/BF01339716 · DOI · Paper page
  2. J. Bjorken, 1964, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, 10.1063/1.3047288 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nnano.2009.71 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.075102 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.011802 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.153002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.190403 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.063622 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.190405 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.033601 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/RevModPhys.30.24 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.073603 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3572 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.2249 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salger, T., Grossert, C., Kling, S., & Weitz, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-12-07
Volume
107
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
70
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review