The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 18 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Revealing inherent quantum interference and entanglement of a Dirac particle
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Although originally predicted in relativistic quantum mechanics, Zitterbewegung can also appear in some classical systems, which leads to the important question of whether Zitterbewegung of Dirac particles is underlain by a more fundamental and universal interference behavior without classical analogs. We here reveal such an interference pattern in phase space, which underlies but goes beyond Zitterbewegung , and whose nonclassicality is manifested by the negativity of the phase space quasiprobability distribution, and the associated pseudospin-momentum entanglement. We confirm this discovery by numerical simulation and an on-chip experiment, where a superconducting qubit and a quantized microwave field respectively emulate the internal and external degrees of freedom of a Dirac particle. The measured quasiprobability negativities agree well with the numerical simulation. Besides being of fundamental importance, the demonstrated nonclassical effects are useful in quantum technology.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reveals a phase-space quantum interference pattern underlying but going beyond Zitterbewegung in a simulated Dirac particle, manifested by Wigner-function negativity and pseudospin-momentum entanglement. It confirms this with numerical simulation and an on-chip superconducting-circuit experiment, including a simulation of Klein tunneling.
Key findings
- The Dirac particle’s dynamics produce a time-evolving phase-space quasiprobability distribution whose nonclassicality appears as negative Wigner-function regions and entanglement between internal and spatial degrees of freedom; measured negativities agree with numerical simulation.
- Zitterbewegung is recovered as the mean-position evolution inferred from measured Wigner functions, but the phase-space interference is more general: it can appear even without negative-energy components and without Zitterbewegung.
- For the positive branch, the entanglement entropy is time-independent and depends on momentum spread, while the unconditional Wigner function still shows a time-evolving interference pattern; this was shown by numerical simulation.
- In a simulated linear potential, the experiment observes a cat-like state and two separated wavepackets with the same momentum but opposite motion, interpreted as Klein tunneling; the drive strength was ϵ = 2π × 0.39 MHz and the evolution time was 288 ns.
Methods
- A superconducting Xmon qubit encoded the Dirac particle’s internal pseudospin, while the quadratures of a microwave bus resonator encoded position and momentum; two longitudinal parametric modulations and a transverse microwave drive realized an effective 1D Dirac Hamiltonian.
- The experiment used two qubits and the bus resonator: Q1 as the test spinor qubit and Q2 as an ancilla for Wigner tomography via phase-space displacement and Rabi-oscillation readout of photon-number populations.
- Main analysis reconstructed Wigner functions, density matrices, von Neumann entropy, and mean position/momentum, comparing experimental data with numerical simulations; Zitterbewegung measurements were taken after 330 ns, and Klein tunneling after 288 ns.
Limitations
- The paper states that current experiments are limited by the accuracy of measuring too many photons (n > 20) in the microwave bosonic field, giving a photon-number capability of about 20 and limiting the phase-space boundary.
- The paper states that the Zitterbewegung simulation ends at 330 ns because of hardware-limited pulse amplitude; longer simulation would require larger pulse amplitude or better qubit performance.
- The paper states that a step-shaped potential is not easy to engineer, so Klein tunneling was simulated with a linear potential instead; it also states that the positive-branch entangled state is experimentally difficult to prepare, so that part was revealed by numerical simulation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
8 of 18 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The nonclassicality of the phase-space interference is manifested by the negativity of the Wigner function quasiprobability distribution.
“whose nonclassicality is manifested by the negativity of the phase space quasiprobability distribution”
- Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
“The nonclassicality of this behavior is manifested by the negativity of the phase space quasiprobability distribution-Wigner function (WF)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
- Findingown data
There is a universal quantum interference behavior in position-momentum space that underlies but goes beyond Zitterbewegung.
“We here reveal such an interference pattern in phase space, which underlies but goes beyond Zitterbewegung”
- Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
“We here present an investigation on this important issue, and unveil a universal quantum interference behavior in the position-momentum space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
- Findingown data
The nonclassicality of the phase-space interference is also manifested by quantum entanglement between the spatial and internal (pseudospin) degrees of freedom.
“and the associated pseudospin-momentum entanglement.”
- Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
“as well as by the quantum correlation between the spatial and internal degrees of freedom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A. Theoretical predictions · plain
- Findingown data
The numerical result confirms that the internal and spatial degrees of freedom remain highly correlated with a time-independent entanglement entropy.
“The numerical result is presented in Supplementary Figure 6(a), which confirms that the internal and spatial degrees freedom remain highly correlated with a time-independent entanglement entropy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Numerical simulations of such WFs show phase space quantum interference patterns for different evolution times.
“Numerical simulations of such WFs are shown in Supplementary Figure 5, where we can see phase space quantum interference patterns for different evolution times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The measured quasiprobability negativities agree well with the numerical simulation.
“The measured quasiprobability negativities agree well with the numerical simulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean position ⟨x⟩ versus time exhibits a linear increase without ZB.
“Additionally, the corresponding mean position ⟨x⟩ versus time is shown in Supplementary Figure 6(b), which exhibits a linear increase without ZB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During the evolution, the initial Gaussian wavepacket is split into two parts propagating in opposite directions.
“As expected, during the evolution the initial Gaussian wavepacket is split into two parts, propagating towards opposite directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Wigner function associated with each qubit state displays a region of negativity that is a purely quantum-mechanical effect.
“The WF associated with each qubit state displays a region of negativity that is a purely quantum-mechanical effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The unconditional Wigner functions under the ideal Dirac Hamiltonian display a time-evolving quantum interference pattern even without correlating the result with the internal state.
“Unexpectedly, the WF displays a time-evolving quantum interference pattern, even without correlating the result with the internal state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The measured von Neumann entropy of the test qubit for different evolution times agrees with numerical simulation, with small fluctuations due to fast Rabi oscillations.
“The measured results (red circles) agree with the numerical simulation (blue curve), where the small fluctuations are due to the fast Rabi oscillations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The entanglement entropy as a function of momentum spread δp is independent of the evolution time.
“The entanglement entropy as a function of δ p is shown in Fig. 3(a), which is independent of the evolution time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The competition between dynamic and static energies leads to a time-evolving phase space quasi-probability distribution, which underlies the spatial motion of the Dirac particle.
“showing that the competition between its dynamic and static energies leads to a time-evolving phase space quasi-probability distribution, which underlies its spatial motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unlike the entropy, the phase space interference pattern is time-dependent.
“Unlike the entropy, the phase space interference pattern is time-dependent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The quantum signatures can express themselves even in the absence of any negative energy component.
“and more importantly, can express themselves even in the absence of any negative component.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The quantum signatures distinguish the Zitterbewegung of the Dirac particle from the trembling motion of classical wavepackets.
“These quantum signatures distinguish the ZB of the Dirac particle, obtained by integrating the WF over the momentum, from the trembling motion of classical wavepackets”
- Also stated in: § III. DISCUSSION · plain
“The measured negativities of the WFs and entanglement entropy distinguish the ZB of the Dirac particle from that exhibited by the classical systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § III. DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
Due to entanglement, spatial quantum interference appears when the Wigner function is correlated with the projection of the pseudospin along some basis.
“Due to this entanglement, the spatial quantum interference appears when the WF is correlated with the projection of the pseudospin along some basis, e.g., {|±B⟩}.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The present on-chip experimental platform can demonstrate a cavity QED system with advantages of adjustable artificial atomic energy spectrum and high coupling-to-decay ratio [λ ≫ (1/T1, 1/T2)].
“Overall, the present on-chip experimental platform can demonstrate a cavity QED system, with advantages of adjustable artificial atomic energy spectrum and high coupling-to-decay ratio [λ ≫ (1/T 1 , 1/T 2 )].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- Probably not a substantial claim. 33
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationZitterbewegung can also appear in some classical wave systems, so it is not a unique character of Dirac particles.
“which itself, however, is not a unique character of Dirac particles as similar phenomena can also appear in some classical wave systems [35][36][37][38][39][40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 6 sources checked- cites [35] Zhang, X. Observing Zitterbewegung for photons near the Dirac point of a two-dimensional photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 113903 (2008). source
- cites [36] Otterbach, J., Unanyan, R. G. & Fleischhauer, M. Confining stationary light: Dirac dynamics and Klein tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 063602 (2009). source
- cites [37] Longhi, S. Photonic analog of Zitterbewegung in binary waveguide arrays. Opt. Lett. 35, 235 (2010). source
- cites [38] Chen, Y. et al. Non-abelian gauge field optics. Nat. Commun. 10, 3125 (2019). source
- cites [39] Dreisow, F. et al. Classical simulation of relativistic Zitterbewegung in photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 143902 (2010). source
- cites [40] Silva, T. L., Taillebois, E. R. F., Gomes, R. M., Walborn, S. P. & Avelar, A. T. Optical simulation of the free Dirac equation. Phys. Rev. A 99, 022332 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe resulting cat-like state was previously predicted as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field, but has not been characterized in previous simulations.
“The resulting cat-like state was previously predicted to exist as a solution of a relativistic spin-1/2 charged particle in an external magnetic field [49], but has not been characterized in previous simulations [50,51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [49] Bermudez, A., Martin-Delgado, M. A. & Solano, E. Mesoscopic superposition states in relativistic Landau levels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 123602 (2007). source
- cites [50] Gerritsma, R. et al. Quantum simulation of the Klein paradox with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060503 (2011). source
The cited paper describes simulations of relativistic scattering in electrostatic potentials and reconstruction of particle wave packets (pp. 1–3). Our copy does not identify a cat-like state or address whether such a state had been characterized in previous simulations. The magnetic-field prediction is attributed to a different citation, [49]. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Salger, T., Grossert, C., Kling, S. & Weitz, M. Klein tunneling of a quasirelativistic Bose-Einstein condensate in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240401 (2011). source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe numerical results with the full Hamiltonian agree well with the experimental simulations shown in Fig. 2 of the main text.
“All these numerical results agree well with the experimental simulations shown in Fig. 2 of the main text.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe measured Wigner functions and entanglement entropy agree well with theoretical predictions.
“The measured WFs and entanglement entropy agree well with theoretical predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe measured time evolutions of ⟨x⟩ and ⟨p⟩ imply that the two wavepackets have the same momentum at each moment but move in opposite directions.
“The measured results imply that the two wavepackets have the same momentum at each moment, but move along the opposite directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningEven when the particle remains in the positive branch, there still exists phase space quantum interference, though ZB disappears.
“We further note that even when the particle remains in the positive branch, there still exists phase space quantum interference, though ZB disappears.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThere is a fixed resonator frequency shift induced by the non-resonant coupling.
“There is a fixed resonator frequency shift induced by the non-resonant coupling, thus we adjust the microwave frequency to about 0.75 MHz to get better results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenFor the present Rabi model, the effective frequency of the qubit and the effective coupling strength are ω/(2π)=2.2 MHz and η=2π×0.78 MHz, respectively.
“For the present Rabi model, the effective frequency of the qubit and the effective coupling strength are ω/(2π) = 2.2 MHz and η = 2π× 0.78 MHz, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe Wigner functions correlated with the measurement outcomes |g⟩ and |e⟩, and the result irrespective of the test qubit's state, were measured after an evolution time of 330 ns.
“The WFs correlated with the measurement outcomes |g⟩ and |e⟩ are presented in the upper panels of Figs.2(a) and 2(b), and the result irrespective of the test qubit's state is displayed in Fig. 2(c), all measured after an evolution time 330 ns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningIn the far-relativistic regime |p| ≫ mc, A ≪ h/2⟨p⟩ ≪ δx, so ZB cannot be observed.
“In the far-relativistic regime |p| ≫ mc, A ≪ h/2 ⟨p⟩ ≪ δx, where δx = h/2δp is the limitation of precision attainable for any position measurement imposed by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe presence of a dispersion coupling between test qubit and bus resonator is λ1^2/Δ ≈ 2π × 1.25 MHz.
“During the preparation of the initial state in the ZB simulation experiment, the presence of a dispersion coupling (form of σ z a † a) between the test qubit and the bus resonator is λ 2 1 /∆ ≈ 2π × 1.25 MHz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe phase difference caused by dispersive interaction during Wigner tomography (time scale 60 ns) is 2λ1^2/Δ × 60 ns ∼ 0.3.
“Note θ e and θ g are slightly different because the dispersive interaction during Wigner tomography (time scale 60 ns, causing phase difference 2λ 2 1 /∆ × 60 ns ∼ 0.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe linear potential drags the phase space evolution down along the p-axis by an amount √2 ε t, but does not affect motion along the x-axis.
“As expected, the linear potential drags the phase space evolution down along the p-axis by an amount √ 2ϵt, but does not affect the motion along the x-axis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenIn the experiment, P_a^g(0) ≤ 0.05, τ is taken every 2 ns from 0 to 200 ns.
“In the experiment, P a g (0) ≤ 0.05, τ is taken every 2 ns from 0 to 200 ns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningIn the non-relativistic regime |p| ≪ mc, the ZB amplitude A ≃ λ_c/2, and consequently ZB cannot be observed.
“In the non-relativistic regime |p| ≪ mc, the ZB amplitude A ≃ λ c /2, where λ c = h/mc is the Compton wavelength, which sets the lower bound for the uncertainty of the position, and consequently, the ZB cannot be observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningFor a specific momentum p, H_D has eigenvalues ±E_p = ±√(p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4) and corresponding eigenstates |φ_+(p)⟩ and |φ_-(p)⟩.
“For a specific value of p, H D has two eigenvalues ±E p = ± p 2 c 2 + m 2 c 4 , with the corresponding eigenstates |ϕ + (p)⟩ = (cos ϕ p , i sin ϕ p ) T and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationThe experiment simulates Klein tunneling in a linear potential field and observes mesoscopic superpositions of two separated wavepackets in phase space.
“Furthermore, we simulate the Klein tunneling [44,45] in a linear potential field and observe mesoscopic superpositions of two separated wavepackets in phase space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe photon number capability of the present system is about 20, resulting in the boundary of phase space in the main text.
“Ergo, the photon number capability of the present system is about 20, resulting in the boundary of phase space in the main text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe quantum interference signatures appear in the phase space spanned by position and momentum, but disappear when the momentum is traced out.
“The quantum interference signatures appear in the phase space spanned by position and momentum, but disappear when the momentum is traced out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe average position evolution under the Dirac Hamiltonian includes a Zitterbewegung term, and ZB is observable only in the intermediate regime where mc is comparable with p.
“The ZB, manifested by the last term, is observable only in the intermediate regime where mc is comparable with p.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The system is initially in the product state |ψ(0)⟩ = ∫ dp ξ_p |p⟩ |X⟩.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe Dirac particle evolves with a time-dependent quantum interference pattern, hidden in the entangled internal-spatial state, and expresses itself in the position-momentum quasiprobability distribution correlated to the internal state.
“These results unambiguously demonstrate that the Dirac particle evolves with a time-dependent quantum interference pattern, which is hidden in the entangled internal-spatial state, and expresses itself in the position-momentum quasiprobability distribution, correlated to the internal state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningUnder the Dirac time evolution, the populations of the two states |±X⟩ become increasingly balanced, and the entropy tends to 1.
“Under the time evolution, the populations of two states |±X⟩ become increasingly balanced, and the entropy tends to 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The system is initially in the product state |ψ(0)⟩ = ∫ dp ξ_p |p⟩ |X⟩.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe qubit-state-dependent resonator frequency shift in the dynamical process is still unavoidable; therefore, additional correction of the results is necessary.
“The qubit-state-dependent resonator frequency shift in the dynamical process is still unavoidable; therefore, additional correction of the results is necessary so as to make the results more intuitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductcitationWe use the same method as in Ref. [9].
“We use the same method as in Ref. [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Krekora, P., Su, Q. & Grobe, R. Relativistic electron localization and the lack of Zitterbewegung. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 043004 (2004). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningPhase space quantum interference is a universal inherent characteristic of Dirac particles, which can manifest itself even without negative components.
“Although ZB appears only when the system is in a superposition of positive and negative components, phase space quantum interference is actually a universal inherent characteristic of Dirac particles, which can manifest itself even without negative components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenThe simulation is performed without the second parametric modulation so that the system dynamics are analogous to a massless particle penetrating a linear potential.
“The simulation is performed without the second parametric modulation so that the system dynamics are analogous to a massless particle penetrating a linear potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataUp to now, together with the initial phase of the microwave pulse, we can implement arbitrary displacement operators D(γ) for Wigner measurements.
“Up to now, together with the initial phase of the microwave pulse, we can implement arbitrary displacement operators D(γ) for Wigner measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe experiment uses a calibration matrix to reconstruct readout results and correct errors caused by decoherence.
“To calibrate these errors, we use a calibration matrix, defined as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataAt t=0 and 76 ns, the positive and negative wavepackets cannot be fully distinguished, so the data for these two mean positions ⟨x⟩ are abandoned in Fig. 3(d) of the main text.
“At t = 0 and 76 ns, the positive and negative wavepackets cannot be fully distinguished, so the data for these two mean positions ⟨x⟩ are abandoned in Fig. 3(d) of the main text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningWith further increase of photon number, entanglement between auxiliary qubit Q2 and resonator can not be ignored, and photon number and its distribution in resonator can not be obtained accurately.
“However, with the further increase of the photon number, the entanglement between the auxiliary qubit Q 2 and the resonator can not be ignored, and the photon number and its distribution in the resonator can not be obtained accurately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenFor a one-dimensional Dirac particle, the Hamiltonian reduces to H_D = cσ_y p + mc^2 σ_z.
“H D = cσ y p + mc 2 σ z .(1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe circuit experiment realizes the Dirac Hamiltonian in a rotating frame, with effective light speed c* = √2η and effective mass m*c*^2 = ε2/4.
“Then the resulting effective Hamiltonian reduces to the form of Eq. ( 1), with the correspondences σ y = i|g⟩⟨e| -i|e⟩⟨g|, σ z = |e⟩⟨e| -|g⟩⟨g|, c * = √ 2η and m * c * 2 = ε 2 /4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The superconducting qubit can be approximated as a two-level system when the coupling λ and transverse field strength Ω are relatively small against the anharmonicity.
- The authors state this as an assumption: ν2 = 2K ≫ η, ε2/2.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenFor the selection of the time point, we try to make the population of states |e⟩ and |g⟩ of the test qubit close to 0.5, making the normalized data of the auxiliary qubit accurate and convenient to fit the photon number distribution of the resonator.
“For the selection of the time point, we try to make the population of states |e⟩ and |g⟩ of the test qubit close to 0.5, making the normalized data of the auxiliary qubit accurate and convenient to fit the photon number distribution of the resonator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPhase space quantum interference effects were previously predicted for some special states with both positive and negative components, but their presence without ZB had not been revealed.
“We note that the phase space quantum interference effects were previously predicted for some special states with both positive and negative components [11], but the presence of such effects without ZB has not been revealed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Pedernales, J. S., Di Candia, R., Ballester, D. & Solano, E. Quantum simulations of relativistic quantum physics in circuit QED. New J. Phys. 15, 055008 (2013). source
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningWhen restricted to the positive branch, the internal degrees of freedom are necessarily entangled with the momentum except for a plane wave with δp → 0.
“This implies that the internal degrees freedom is necessarily entangled with the momentum except for a plane wave with δp → 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe desired modulation of ωq(t) can be realized by mapping it to the modulation of Z bias.
“The desired modulation of ωq(t) can be realized by mapping it to the modulation of Z bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe phases of the driving pulses are optimized to make the experimental dynamics closer to the Dirac dynamics.
“making the experiment dynamics closer to the Dirac dynamics.We traverse these two phases (ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 ) between 0 and 2π”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe superconducting bus resonator possesses a bosonic mode, as demonstrated in prior work.
“the superconducting bus resonator, characterized by a quantized microwave field, was demonstrated [1,[3][4][5][6][7] to possess a bosonic mode”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1,[3][4][5][6][7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe present platform can be utilized to emulate the external degrees of freedom of a Dirac particle.
“which can be utilized to emulate the external degrees of freedom of a Dirac particle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningWith the assumption ν2 = 2K ≫ η, ε2/2, the system Hamiltonian can be well approximated by H''_I = -η e^{-iθ} a† σ_θ + H.c. + ωσ_z, and when θ = π/2 this effective Hamiltonian has the same form as the 1+1 Dirac equation.
“With the assumption ν 2 = 2K ≫ η, ε 2 /2 and under the further transformation exp(iKσ θ t), the system Hamiltonian can be well approximated by”
- Also stated in: § Figure 4 · plain
“When θ = π/2, this effective Hamiltonian has the same form as the 1+1 Dirac equation of a spin-1/2 particle, with the correspondence c * = √ 2η and m * c * 2 = ω.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The superconducting qubit can be approximated as a two-level system when the coupling λ and transverse field strength Ω are relatively small against the anharmonicity.
- The authors state this as an assumption: ν2 = 2K ≫ η, ε2/2.
- Also stated in: § Figure 4 · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationFor x > 0, the momentum of the Dirac particle is given by p^2 = (E - V) 2m^2 (c=1), with group velocity v_g = dE/dp = p/(E - V); when a massless particle moves from left to right with E < V, p is assigned its negative solution so that v_g is positive.
“For x > 0, the momentum of the Dirac particle is given by p 2 = (E -V ) 2m 2 (c = 1), with the group velocity v g = dE/dp = p/(E -V ) [45].When the massless particle moves from left to right with E < V , p is assigned with its negative solution, so that v g is positive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Dombey, N. Seventy years of the Klein paradox. Phys. Rep. 315, 41 (1999). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataBoth θ_e and θ_g are around 1.3, offsetting the resonator phase induced by the frame difference, demonstrating that the rotation of our data is reasonable.
“While both θ e and θ g are around 1.3, offsetting the resonator phase induced by the frame difference, and therefore demonstrating that the rotation of our data is reasonable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis limitation can be solved by increasing the detuning between the qubit and cavity (>2π × 800 MHz), which requires improvement of microwave signal control hardware.
“This limitation can be solved by increasing the detuning between the qubit and cavity (>2π × 800 MHz), which requires the improvement of microwave signal control hardware in the present experimental platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenA larger number of photons requires Wigner tomography within a larger phase space region.
“As mentioned in the main text, a larger number of photons requires Wigner tomography within a larger phase space region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningDue to hardware-limited pulse amplitude, we can increase the size of |γ| by increasing the length of the tomography pulse, at the cost of increasing the dispersive interaction time.
“Due to the hardware-limited pulse amplitude, we can increase the size of |γ| by increasing the length of the tomography pulse, at the cost of increasing the dispersive interaction time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningDue to the finite detuning Δ = 2π × 470 MHz between the auxiliary qubit Q2 and bus resonator R, as the number of photons increases, ancilla qubit Q2 inevitably interacts with the resonator during the Dirac dynamics, the ground state population P_a^g(0) may not be 1 at τ = 0.
“It is worth noting that due to the finite detuning ∆ = 2π × 470 MHz between the auxiliary qubit Q 2 and bus resonator R, as the number of photons increases, ancilla qubit Q 2 inevitably interacts with the resonator during the Dirac dynamics, the ground state population P a g (0) may not be 1 at τ = 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe Zitterbewegung phenomenon appears as the integral of the weighted mixture of the two Wigner functions over momentum, which reflects the classical probability distribution but does not manifest the underlying quantum nature.
“The ZB phenomenon appears as the integral of the weighted mixture of the two WFs over the momentum, which reflects the classical probability distribution, but does not manifest the underlying quantum nature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe negativity arises because each component accumulates a momentum- and mass-dependent nonlinear phase, a non-Gaussian operation, and the two rods sprouting from the distorted wavepacket interfere, resulting in negative quasiprobability between them.
“Under the Dirac Hamiltonian, each component accumulates a phase that nonlinearly depends on the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenQuantum interference is a universal inherent characteristic of Dirac particles, which can manifest itself even without negative components.
“As stated in the main text, quantum interference is actually a universal inherent characteristic of Dirac particles, which can manifest itself even without negative components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Study design and conductnone givenProper phase space rotations performed to compensate for Stark shifts produced by discarded off-resonant couplings do not change the quantum effects in any way.
“To compensate for the difference due to the Stark shifts produced by the discarded off-resonant couplings, we perform proper phase space rotations, which, however, do not change the quantum effects in any way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationAll the WF values in the main text are deduced from the photon number distribution.
“All the WF values in the main text are deduced from the photon number distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductcitationReferring to [10], the potentially slight excitation can be ignored and thus P_a^g(0) is introduced to make the fit more accurate.
“Referring to [10], the potentially slight excitation can be ignored and thus P a g (0) is introduced to make the fit more accurate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Wang, Z.-Y. & Xiong, C.-D. Zitterbewegung by quantum field-theory considerations. Phys. Rev. A 77, 045402 (2008). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningZitterbewegung itself does not manifest quantum effects, but is closely related to quantum entanglement between the internal and spatial degrees of freedom produced by their coupling.
“As we have noted, ZB itself does not manifest quantum effects, but is closely related to quantum entanglement between the internal and spatial degrees of freedom, produced by their coupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningIn this way, we can get all the information about the resonator state.
“In this way, we can get all the information about the resonator state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Study design and conductnone givenCurrent experiments are limited by the accuracy of measuring too many photons (n>20) in the microwave bosonic field.
“Nevertheless, current experiments are limited by the accuracy of measuring too many photons (n>20) in the microwave bosonic field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe time-evolving mean position inferred from the measured Wigner function coincides with the simulation, confirming that Zitterbewegung has a deeper root that is of pure quantum characteristic.
“This evolution, inferred from the measured WF, is presented in Fig. 2(e), which coincides with the simulation (green curve), confirming that ZB has a deeper root that is of pure quantum characteristic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe photon number distribution P_n is inferred by the Rabi oscillation signal [14].
“The photon number distribution P n is inferred by the Rabi oscillation signal [14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Vaishnav, J. Y. & Clark, C. W. Observing Zitterbewegung with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 153002 (2008). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningConsidering the finite detuning between the auxiliary qubit and the resonator, our ZB simulation ends at 330 ns.
“Considering the finite detuning between the auxiliary qubit and the resonator, our ZB simulation ends at 330 ns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationcitationThe demonstrated nonclassicality can serve as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing.
“In addition to fundamental interest, the demonstrated nonclassicality can serve as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Kwon, H., Tan, K. C., Volkoff, T. & Jeong, H. Nonclassicality as a quantifiable resource for quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040503 (2019). source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningWith the setting ω_r = ω0 + 2ν1, the resonator interacts with the qubit at the second sideband associated with the first modulation, while the microwave drive works at the carrier.
“With this setting, the resonator interacts with the qubit at the second sideband associated with the first modulation, while the microwave drive works at the carrier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: ω_r = ω0 + 2ν1.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningDuring evolution, the wavepacket is continually deformed by competition between momentum-dependent and static energy terms, leading to nonlinear energy dependence on momentum; this non-Gaussian process manifests pseudospin-dependent quantum interference signatures.
“During the evolution, the wavepacket is continually deformed under the competition between the momentum-dependent and static energy terms in the Dirac Hamiltonian, which leads to a nonlinear dependence of the energy on the momentum.This nonlinear process evolves an initial Gaussian wavepacket to a non-Gaussian one, manifesting pseudospin-dependent quantum interference signatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenAlthough ancilla qubits can be biased further down to increase detuning in Dirac dynamics, performance of qubits deteriorates and frequency changes more widely, affecting measurement results.
“It is also worth noting that although ancilla qubits can be biased further down to increase the detuning in the Dirac dynamics, the performance of the qubits deteriorates and the frequency changes more widely, affecting the measurement results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe experimental data are in good agreement with the ideal ones, which proves the correctness of our method.
“In this case, the optimized population is shown in Supplementary Figure 8, and the experimental data are in good agreement with the ideal ones, which proves the correctness of our method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
A deep exploration of whether Zitterbewegung of Dirac particles has a deeper quantum origin that can manifest without ZB is still lacking.
“but a deep exploration is still lacking.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The superconducting qubit can be approximated as a two-level system when the coupling λ and transverse field strength Ω are relatively small against the anharmonicity.
“Here, the superconducting qubit can be approximated as a two-level system when the coupling λ and transverse field strength Ω are relatively small (all 2π × 20 MHz) against the anharmonicity 2π × 250 MHz.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
ν2 = 2K ≫ η, ε2/2.
“With the assumption ν 2 = 2K ≫ η, ε 2 /2 and under the further transformation exp(iKσ θ t), the system Hamiltonian can be well approximated by”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The system is initially in the product state |ψ(0)⟩ = ∫ dp ξ_p |p⟩ |X⟩.
“Suppose that the system is initially in the product state”
The authors state this as an assumption.
ω_r = ω0 + 2ν1.
“We here assume ω r = ω 0 + 2ν 1 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
|ξ_p|^2 satisfies a Gaussian distribution with p0=1, δp=1.
“We assume that |ξ p | 2 satisfies Gaussian distribution, i.e., |ξ p | 2 = 1/(δp √ 2π)e -(p-p0) 2 /(2δp 2 ) , with p 0 = 1, δp = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In numerical simulations, the Dirac particle has mass m=1 and a Gaussian momentum distribution with mean p0=1.
“In the numerical simulations, the Dirac particle is supposed to have a mass of m = 1 and a Gaussian momentum distribution with a mean value of p0 = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Natural units with h=c=1 are used.
“For simplicity, we here take the natural unit with h = c = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The momentum has a Gaussian distribution centered at p0=1 with spread δp=1.
“The momentum is supposed to have a Gaussian distribution, centered at p0 = 1 with the spread δp = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The simulated Dirac particle has mass m=1.
“The simulated Dirac particle has a mass of m = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
ℏ and c in the Dirac Hamiltonian are both set to 1.
“For simplicity, ℏ and c in the Dirac Hamiltonian are both set to be 1.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ancilla ground-state population conflicts with the stated slight excitation
MinorThe methods describe only a potentially slight excitation of the ancilla at τ = 0, but then give its ground-state population as at most 0.05. That bound would mean the ancilla is almost entirely excited.
“In the experiment, P a g (0) ≤ 0.05”
“the ground state population P a g (0) may not be 1 at τ = 0. Referring to [10], the potentially slight excitation can be ignored”
Wavepacket data are referred to the wrong main-text figure
MinorThe supplementary methods locate omitted mean-position data in Fig. 3(d), but the main text identifies Fig. 4(d) as the Klein-tunneling mean-position plot.
“the data for these two mean positions ⟨x⟩ are abandoned in Fig. 3(d) of the main text.”
“we display the time evolutions of the measured ⟨x⟩ and ⟨p⟩ in Figs.4(d) and 4(e), respectively”
Klein-tunneling end time is given as both 280 and 288 ns
MinorThe rotation procedure defines t_f as the end time and assigns 280 ns for Klein tunneling, while the reported Klein-tunneling evolution ends at 288 ns.
“(θ e,0 , θ g,0 , θ e , θ g , t f ) = (0, 0, 1.402, 1.162, 280 ns) in the Klein tunneling simulation”
“The evolution times t of the two experiments are 330 ns and 288 ns, respectively.”
Klein-tunneling initial state differs between descriptions
MinorThe supplementary methods say both simulations start in a qubit superposition and resonator vacuum. The Figure 4 legend instead says the Klein-tunneling system starts in |g, 0⟩.
“set the initial state of the system to be |ψ⟩ = 1 √ 2 (|e⟩ + |g⟩) ⊗ |0⟩ in both the ZB and Klein tunneling simulations”
“These WFs are reconstructed for the system evolving from the initial ground state |g, 0⟩ for a time 288 ns.”
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739
On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non-Relativistic Limit
Foldy, L. L., & Wouthuysen, S. A. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.78.29 · Cited by 2,183
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13171 · Cited by 1,733
A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology.
Beyer, T., Townsend, D. W., Brun, T., Kinahan, P. E., Charron, M., Roddy, R., Jerin, J., Young, J., Byars, L. G., & Nutt, R. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,655
Thaller, B. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02753-0 · Cited by 1,530
Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus
Majer, J., Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J., Koch, J., Johnson, B., Schreier, J. A., Frunzio, L., Schuster, D., Houck, A., Wallraff, A. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06184 · Cited by 1,344
Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac
Klein, O. (1929) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01339716 · Cited by 1,080
Creating, moving and merging Dirac points with a Fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice
Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Jotzu, G., & Esslinger, T. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10871 · Cited by 972
Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator
Hofheinz, M., Wang, H., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lucero, E. A., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wenner, J., Martinis, J. M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08005 · Cited by 882
Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., Chen, Y., Yin, Y., Chiaro, B., Mutus, J., Neill, C., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.080502 · Cited by 779
Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation
Gerritsma, R., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08688 · Cited by 725
Anisotropic behaviours of massless Dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials
Park, C.-H., Yang, L., Son, Y., Cohen, M. L., & Louie, S. G. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys890 · Cited by 694
Observing Zitterbewegung for Photons near the Dirac Point of a Two-Dimensional Photonic Crystal
Zhang, X. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.113903 · Cited by 315
Observation of Zitterbewegung in a spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate
Qu, C., Hamner, C., Gong, M., Zhang, C., & Engels, P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.021604 · Cited by 307
Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion
Lamata, L., León, J., Schätz, T., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.253005 · Cited by 300
Seventy years of the Klein paradox
Dombey, N. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00023-x · Cited by 251
Zitterbewegung of Electronic Wave Packets in III-V Zinc-Blende Semiconductor Quantum Wells
Schliemann, J., Loss, D., & Westervelt, R. M. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.206801 · Cited by 238
Classical Simulation of Relativistic Zitterbewegung in Photonic Lattices
Dreisow, F., Heinrich, M., Keil, R., Tünnermann, A., Nolte, S., Longhi, S., & Szameit, A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.143902 · Cited by 235
Observing Zitterbewegung with Ultracold Atoms
Vaishnav, J., & Clark, C. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.153002 · Cited by 210
Quantum Simulation of the Klein Paradox with Trapped Ions
Gerritsma, R., Lanyon, B. P., Kirchmair, G., Zähringer, F., Hempel, C., Casanova, J., García-Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060503 · Cited by 204
Unified description of Zitterbewegung for spintronic, graphene, and superconducting systems
Cserti, J., & Dávid, G. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.172305 · Cited by 198
Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Rabi model with a single trapped ion
Cai, M.-L., Liu, Z., Zhao, W.-D., Wu, Y.-K., Mei, Q.-X., Jiang, Y., He, L., Zhang, X., Zhou, Z.-C., & Duan, L.-M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21425-8 · Cited by 189
Direct observation of zitterbewegung in a Bose–Einstein condensate
LeBlanc, L. J., Beeler, M. C., Jiménez-García, K., Perry, A. R., Sugawa, S., Williams, R. A., & Spielman, I. B. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073011 · Cited by 186
Quantum Simulation of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion
Lv, D., An, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, J.-N., Pedernales, J. S., Lamata, L., Solano, E., & Kim, K. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021027 · Cited by 185
Nonclassicality as a Quantifiable Resource for Quantum Metrology
Kwon, H., Tan, K. C., Volkoff, T., & Jeong, H. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040503 · Cited by 165
Zitterbewegung of electrons in graphene in a magnetic field
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.125419 · Cited by 163
Measurement of the Decay of Fock States in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit
Wang, H., Hofheinz, M., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lucero, E. A., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wenner, J., Cleland, A. N., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.240401 · Cited by 161
Transient Zitterbewegung of charge carriers in mono- and bilayer graphene, and carbon nanotubes
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.195439 · Cited by 139
Theory of electron Zitterbewegung in graphene probed by femtosecond laser pulses
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.045416 · Cited by 133
Photonic analog of Zitterbewegung in binary waveguide arrays
Longhi, S. (2010) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.35.000235 · Cited by 131
Zitterbewegung and its effects on electrons in semiconductors
Zawadzki, W. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.085217 · Cited by 128
Relativistic Electron Localization and the Lack of Zitterbewegung
Krekora, P., Su, Q., & Grobe, R. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.043004 · Cited by 100
Mesoscopic Superposition States in Relativistic Landau Levels
Bermudez, A., Martin-Delgado, M. A., & Solano, E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.123602 · Cited by 95
Photon-assisted electron transport in graphene: Scattering theory analysis
Trauzettel, B., Blanter, Y. M., & Morpurgo, A. F. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.035305 · Cited by 95
Zitterbewegung of electrons and holes in III–V semiconductor quantum wells
Schliemann, J., Loss, D., & Westervelt, R. M. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.085323 · Cited by 93
Non-Abelian gauge field optics
Chen, Y., Zhang, R.-Y., Xiong, Z., Hang, Z. H., Li, J., Shen, J. Q., & Chan, C. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10974-8 · Cited by 88
Wave packet dynamics in a monolayer graphene
Maksimova, G. M., Demikhovskii, V. Y., & Frolova, E. V. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.235321 · Cited by 88
Song, C., Zheng, S., Zhang, P., Xu, K., Zhang, L., Guo, Q., Liu, W., Xu, D., Deng, H., Huang, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01156-5 · Cited by 88
Self-citationGeneration of Nonclassical Motional States of a Trapped Atom
Meekhof, D. M., Monroe, C. R., King, B. E., Itano, W. M., & Wineland, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2346 · Cited by 87
Observation of the Mass Difference between Neutral Charm-Meson Eigenstates
Aaij, R., Beteta, C. A., Ackernley, T., Adeva, B., Adinolfi, M., Afsharnia, H., Aidala, C., Aiola, S., Ajaltouni, Z., Akar, S., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.111801 · Cited by 77
Klein Tunneling of a Quasirelativistic Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Lattice
Salger, T., Grossert, C., Kling, S., & Weitz, M. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.240401 · Cited by 70
Deterministic Entanglement Swapping in a Superconducting Circuit
Ning, W., Huang, X.-J., Han, P., Li, H., Deng, H., Yang, Z., Zhong, Z., Xia, Y., Xu, K., Zheng, D., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.060502 · Cited by 67
Self-citationObservation of a Superradiant Phase Transition with Emergent Cat States
Zheng, R., Ning, W., Chen, Y., Lu, J., Shen, L.-T., Xu, K., Zhang, Y.-R., Xu, D., Li, H., Xia, Y., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.113601 · Cited by 57
Self-citationConfining Stationary Light: Dirac Dynamics and Klein Tunneling
Otterbach, J., Unanyan, R. G., & Fleischhauer, M. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.063602 · Cited by 49
Deng, H., Ye, F., Malomed, B. A., Chen, X., & Panoiu, N. C. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.201402 · Cited by 47
Synthesizing three-body interaction of spin chirality with superconducting qubits
Liu, W., Feng, W., Ren, W., Wang, D.-W., & Wang, H. (2020) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5140884 · Cited by 41
Quantum simulations of relativistic quantum physics in circuit QED
Pedernales, J. S., Di Candia, R., Ballester, D., & Solano, E. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/055008 · Cited by 40
Cyclotron motion and magnetic focusing in semiconductor quantum wells with spin-orbit coupling
Schliemann, J. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.125303 · Cited by 32
Wave Packet Dynamics in Synthetic Non-Abelian Gauge Fields
Hasan, M., Madasu, C. S., Rathod, K. D., Kwong, C. C., Miniatura, C., Chevy, F., & Wilkowski, D. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.130402 · Cited by 29
Zitterbewegung of nearly-free and tightly-bound electrons in semiconductors
Rusin, T. M., & Zawadzki, W. (2007) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/13/136219 · Cited by 27
Study of Zitterbewegung in graphene bilayer with perpendicular magnetic field
Wang, Y., Yang, Z. M., & Xiong, S. (2010) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/89/17007 · Cited by 22
Self-citationZitterbewegung by quantum field-theory considerations
Wang, Z.-Y., & Xiong, C.-D. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.045402 · Cited by 21
Zitterbewegung of Moiré Excitons in Twisted MoS2/WSe2 Heterobilayers
Lavor, I. R., da Costa, D. R., Covaci, L., Miloševıć, M. V., Peeters, F. M., & Chaves, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.106801 · Cited by 19
Wave packet dynamics and zitterbewegung of heavy holes in a quantizing magnetic field
Biswas, T., & Ghosh, T. K. (2014) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4880740 · Cited by 18
Lavor, I. R., da Costa, D. R., Chaves, A., Sena, S. H. R., Farias, G. A., Duppen, B. V., & Peeters, F. M. (2020) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abcd7f · Cited by 16
Optical simulation of the free Dirac equation
Silva, T. L., Taillebois, E. R. F., Gomes, R. M., Walborn, S. P., & Avelar, A. T. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022332 · Cited by 14
Pseudospin-dependent Zitterbewegung in monolayer graphene
Serna, E., Rodríguez-Vargas, I., Pérez-Álvarez, R., & Cisneros, L. D. (2019) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5078642 · Cited by 11
Relativistic electron localization and the lack of Zitterbewegung
Krekora, P., Su, Q. C., & Grobe, R. (2004) · APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting Abstracts · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schrödinger, E. Über die kräftefreie bewegung in der relativistischen quantenmechanik. Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys.-Math. Kl. 24, 418 (1930).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dirac fermions in a spinning conical Gödel-type spacetime
Oliveira, R. R. S. (2024) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad69f5 · Cited by 11
Efficient protocol for exploring the quantum interference and entanglement of Dirac particles
Qiu, Y., Yan, K.-X., Lin, J.-H., Song, J., Chen, Y.-H., & Xia, Y. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/adf76f · Cited by 8
“When x > 0, the momentum of Dirac particles can be given by p [39], so the group velocity v g = d E / d p = p / ( E − V ) .”
InfluentialSelf-citationOne-step implementation of a nonadiabatic geometric fSim gate in superconducting circuits
Yun, M.-R., Shan, Z., Sun, L.-N., Yan, L.-L., Jia, Y., Su, S., & Chen, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022608 · Cited by 5
Experimental simulation of Dirac equation in superconducting qubits
Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Ma, Z., Zheng, W., Lan, D., Tan, X., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02112-2 · Cited by 3
Dirac fermions under rainbow gravity effects in the Bonnor–Melvin–Lambda spacetime
Oliveira, R. R. S. (2026) · Indian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1007/s12648-026-03943-7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ning, W., Zheng, R.-H., Xia, Y., Xu, K., Li, H., Zheng, D., Fan, H., Wu, F., Yang, Z.-B., & Zheng, S.-B.
- Affiliations
- Fuzhou University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Fan
- Yang, Zhen-Biao
- Zheng, Shi-Biao
- ORCID
- Venue
- npj Quantum Information
- Published
- 2023-10-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387476470
- Semantic Scholar
- e260616775f5000e79f124937238ca1f30e274eb
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11875108, XDB28000000, 12274080, 2020J06011, 92065114, 11934018, 2021ZD0300200, 12204105, T2121001)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB28000000,)
- Fuzhou University (049050011050, JG202001-2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- Zitterbewegung, Dirac particles, quantum interference, nonclassicality, superconducting qubits, quantum simulation, relativistic quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review