Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,869

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment

Open access
Ahn, J. K., Chebotaryov, S., Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Choi, W., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Jeong, I. S., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, B. C., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Lee, J., Lee, J. K., Lim, I. T., Ma, K. J., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., Park, J. S., Park, K. S., Shin, J. W., Siyeon, K., Yang, B. S., Yeo, I. S., Yi, S. H., Yu, I.·2012·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The RENO experiment has observed the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos, consistent with neutrino oscillations, with a significance of 4.9 standard deviations. Antineutrinos from six $2.8\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{GW}}_{\mathrm{th}}$ reactors at the Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant in Korea, are detected by two identical detectors located at 294 and 1383 m, respectively, from the reactor array center. In the 229 d data-taking period between 11 August 2011 and 26 March 2012, the far (near) detector observed 17102 (154088) electron antineutrino candidate events with a background fraction of 5.5% (2.7%). The ratio of observed to expected numbers of antineutrinos in the far detector is $0.920\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.009(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.014(\mathrm{syst})$. From this deficit, we determine ${sin}^{2}2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}=0.113\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.013(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.019(\mathrm{syst})$ based on a rate-only analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.191802

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,869

Metadata

Authors
Ahn, J. K., Chebotaryov, S., Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Choi, W., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Jeong, I. S., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, B. C., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Lee, J., Lee, J. K., Lim, I. T., Ma, K. J., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., Park, J. S., Park, K. S., Shin, J. W., Siyeon, K., Yang, B. S., Yeo, I. S., Yi, S. H., & Yu, I.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
108
Issue
19
Pages
191802-191802
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2104347824
Cited by
1,869
References
1
FWCI
147.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.108.191802
The paper
Ahn, J. K., Chebotaryov, S., Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Choi, W., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Jeong, I. S., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, B. C., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., . . . Yu, I. (2012). Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.191802

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.