Cited by 158Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications

Role of Magnetic Induction Currents in Nanoslit Excitation of Surface Plasmon Polaritons

Lee, Seung-Yeol, Lee, Il-Min, Park, Junghyun, Oh, Sewoong, Lee, Wooyoung, Kim, Kyoung-Youm, Lee, Byoungho·2012·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present a method for exciting surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) caused by a magnetic field component perpendicular to the direction of slit. The excitation mechanism is based on the spatially oscillating induced current along the edges of the slit under obliquely incident electromagnetic waves. Our finding distinguishes itself from previous mechanisms based on transverse electric fields and unveils the missing point of the SPP-excitation problem in a nanoslit. The use of a magnetic field for SPP excitation can be highly efficient and even comparable to that with an electric field, so that their composition can lead to selective unidirectional excitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.213907

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum and geometric (Berry) phases for light.

    “Two important fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum 57- 59 and geometric (Berry) phases for light 60- 62 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [58]

  • For paraxial optical beams, angular momentum can be decomposed into three separately-observable components: spin AM, intrinsic orbital AM, and extrinsic orbital AM.

    “For paraxial (collimated) optical beams, AM can be decomposed in three separately-observable components: (i) spin AM (SAM), (ii) intrinsic orbital AM (IOAM), and (iii) extrinsic orbital AM (EOAM).”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S.-Y., Lee, I.-M., Park, J., Oh, S., Lee, W., Kim, K.-Y., & Lee, B.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Sejong University (KR)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
108
Issue
21
Pages
213907-213907
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2323264240
Cited by
158
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
surface plasmon polaritons, nanoslits, oblique incidence, magnetic field excitation, unidirectional excitation, edge currents, plasmonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review