Cited by 70Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Measurement Bounds beyond the Uncertainty Relations

Open access
Giovannetti, Vittorio, Lloyd, Seth, Maccone, Lorenzo·2012·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations and the Cramér-Rao inequalities typically limit the precision in the estimation of a parameter through the standard deviation of a conjugate observable. Here we extend these relations by giving a bound to the precision of a parameter in terms of the expectation value of the conjugate observable. This has both foundational and practical consequences: in quantum optics it resolves a controversy over which is the ultimate precision in interferometry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.260405

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For any pair of conjugate variables, the same reasoning can establish tight bounds on the precision with which they can be estimated.

    “However, the remarkable insight of [269] is that for any pair of conjugate variables this reasoning can be used to establish tight bounds on the precision with which they can be estimated.”
  • While the Cramer-Rao bound is asymptotically tight in the number of measurements, for moderate numbers of measurements the reasoning based on conjugate variables leads to a tighter bound.

    “Interestingly, while the Cramer-Rao bound is asymptotically tight (in the number of measurements performed), for moderate numbers of measurements this line of reasoning leads to a tighter bound.”
  • Giovannetti, Lloyd, and Maccone derived an alternative bound on the root mean squared error for μ, equation (148), using a quantum speed limit that links fidelity to parameter difference.

    “In [269] the authors derive an alternative bound on the root mean squared error for μ ∆µ κ M( H -E 0 ) ,(148) where E 0 is the minimum eigenvalue of H and κ is a constant.To establish equation ( 148) the authors use the fact that a 'quantum speed limit' in this instance, which links the fidelity, F, of the states for values of the parameter μ and µ to the difference µ -µ through the mapping U µ ,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement
  2. 10.1103/PhysRev.34.163 · DOI · Paper page
  3. C. W. Helstrom, 1976, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, 10.1007/BF01007479 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2153 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2944 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2598 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2352 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R4649 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.120501 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103602 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010401 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.210404 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052109 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1088/0305-4470/16/13/021 · DOI · Paper page
  18. L. Mandelstam, 1945, J. Phys. (USSR), 9, 249
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.180402 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.059904 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2377 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0030-4018(90)90464-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052114 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5098 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.053804 · DOI
  26. 10.2201/NiiPi.2011.8.9 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.041802 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
108
Issue
26
Pages
260405-260405
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2043396597
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
uncertainty principle, Cramér-Rao inequality, parameter estimation, conjugate observables, quantum interferometry, quantum optics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review