The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Measurement Bounds beyond the Uncertainty Relations
Open accessAbstract
In quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations and the Cramér-Rao inequalities typically limit the precision in the estimation of a parameter through the standard deviation of a conjugate observable. Here we extend these relations by giving a bound to the precision of a parameter in terms of the expectation value of the conjugate observable. This has both foundational and practical consequences: in quantum optics it resolves a controversy over which is the ultimate precision in interferometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For any pair of conjugate variables, the same reasoning can establish tight bounds on the precision with which they can be estimated.
“However, the remarkable insight of [269] is that for any pair of conjugate variables this reasoning can be used to establish tight bounds on the precision with which they can be estimated.”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [269]
While the Cramer-Rao bound is asymptotically tight in the number of measurements, for moderate numbers of measurements the reasoning based on conjugate variables leads to a tighter bound.
“Interestingly, while the Cramer-Rao bound is asymptotically tight (in the number of measurements performed), for moderate numbers of measurements this line of reasoning leads to a tighter bound.”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [269]
Giovannetti, Lloyd, and Maccone derived an alternative bound on the root mean squared error for μ, equation (148), using a quantum speed limit that links fidelity to parameter difference.
“In [269] the authors derive an alternative bound on the root mean squared error for μ ∆µ κ M( H -E 0 ) ,(148) where E 0 is the minimum eigenvalue of H and κ is a constant.To establish equation ( 148) the authors use the fact that a 'quantum speed limit' in this instance, which links the fidelity, F, of the states for values of the parameter μ and µ to the difference µ -µ through the mapping U µ ,”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [269]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
�ber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik
Heisenberg, W. (1927) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01397280 · Cited by 4,278
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Self-citationProbabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887
Ziv–Zakai error bounds for quantum parameter estimation
Tsang, M. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.230401 · Cited by 137
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement
- 10.1103/PhysRev.34.163 · DOI · Paper page
- C. W. Helstrom, 1976, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, 10.1007/BF01007479 · DOI
- 10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2153 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2944 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2598 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2352 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R4649 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.120501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103602 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.210404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0305-4470/16/13/021 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Mandelstam, 1945, J. Phys. (USSR), 9, 249
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.180402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.059904 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2377 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-4018(90)90464-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052114 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5098 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.053804 · DOI
- 10.2201/NiiPi.2011.8.9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.041802 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa86c6 · Cited by 585
Quantum Bell–Ziv–Zakai bounds and Heisenberg limits for waveform estimation
Berry, D. W., Tsang, M., Hall, M. J. W., & Wiseman, H. M. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.031018 · Cited by 81
Quantum metrological bounds for vector parameters
Zhang, Y.-R., & Fan, H. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043818 · Cited by 51
Quantum Weiss–Weinstein bounds for quantum metrology
Lu, X.-M., & Tsang, M. (2016) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/1/1/015002 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 260405-260405
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2043396597
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- uncertainty principle, Cramér-Rao inequality, parameter estimation, conjugate observables, quantum interferometry, quantum optics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review